- 1 Definition of culture jamming
- 2 Words nearbyculture jamming
- 3 How to useculture jammingin a sentence
- 4 Culture Jamming for Social Change
- 5 The Critical Theory Behind Culture Jamming
- 6 Emma Sulkowicz and Rape Culture
- 7 Black Lives Matter and Justice
- 8 Culture Jamming at Its Best
- 9 What Do You Mean By “Culture Jamming”?”: An Interview with Moritz Fink and Marilyn DeLaure (Part One) — Henry Jenkins
- 10 The New Culture Jamming: How Activists Will Respond to Online Advertising
- 11 Culture Jamming
- 12 References:
- 13 Urban Dictionary: culture jam
- 14 Culture Jamming: Subversion as Protest
Definition of culture jamming
Nouna form of political and social activism in which, through the use of fake advertisements, hoaxed news stories, pastiches of company logos and product labels, computer hacking, and other means, the public is drawn to and at the same time subverts the power of the media, governments, and large corporations to control and distort the information that they give the public in order to promote consumerism, militarism, and other forms of exploitation.
Nouna form of political and social activism in which, through the EVALUATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF AFFECT AND EFFECT VERSUS AFFECT!
Words nearbyculture jamming
Culture diffusion, cultured pearl, culture factor, culture-free test, culture hero, culture jamming, culture medium, culture pattern, culture shock, culture specific syndrome, culture attribute are all terms used to describe anything that happens in a culture. 2012 Digital Edition of the Collins English Dictionary – Complete Unabridged Edition (William Collins SonsCo. Ltd. 1979, 1986) In 1998, HarperCollinsPublishers published the following books: 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, and 2012.
How to useculture jammingin a sentence
- Charlie made fun of my faith and culture, and I died protecting his freedom to do so
- Charlie made fun of my faith and culture
- I’m not sure why or who is doing it, but it’s part of the heritage. and it is a heritage that is extremely significant to the culture
- A large portion of the culture around films in the science fiction/fantasy genre is devoted to analyzing them over and over again
- It remains to be seen whether he receives the recognition he deserves in popular culture.
- A establishment that may represent the much-discussed college “hook-up culture” would be Shooters
- It is the epitome of what the term “hook-up culture” means. Since 1580, Cubans have practiced this art, with huge quantities of it being sent to Europe from the country and neighboring Caribbean islands. It is a very different thing to have a culture of expression than it is to have a skillful copy of the signals of passion and intent
- While growing up, a youngster who is exposed to humanizing influences from culture quickly rises above the primitive phase of development. In contrast to this, Charles II disapproved of the country’s cultural traditions
- It would be a safe bet to say that the Accadian civilisation represented a period of expansion of at least ten thousand years.
Culture Jamming for Social Change
Culture jamming is the technique of interfering with the humdrum aspect of everyday life and the status quo by performing or creating artworks that are unexpected, frequently comedic or sarcastic in character. Advertising and consumerism were popularized by the anti-consumerist organization Adbusters, which frequently use the approach to compel individuals who come into contact with their work to consider the existence and effect of advertising and consumerism in our lives. The consumption of commodities has an unquestionable role in our lives, despite the numerous human and environmental costs associated with global mass production.
Key Takeaways: Culture Jamming
- Creating images or behaviors that push viewers to challenge the current quo is referred to as culture jamming. Culture jamming causes social norms to be disrupted and is frequently employed as a strategy for social change. In order to increase awareness of a variety of concerns, activists have employed cultural jamming techniques, such as sweatshop work, sexual assault on college campuses, and police brutality.
The Critical Theory Behind Culture Jamming
Culture jamming frequently involves the usage of a meme that is a revision or parody of a well recognized symbol of a corporate brand (such as Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nike, and Apple, to name a few examples) to create a humorous effect. The meme is often intended to call into question the brand image and ideals associated with a business’s logo, to call into question the consumer’s connection with the brand, and to draw attention to potentially detrimental activities taken by the organization.
Harsher is preferable than harsher.
When used in cultural jamming, memes are intended to elicit feelings of shock, embarrassment, fear, and finally fury in the spectator by inverting the image and values associated with a particular corporate brand.
A meme or a public performance can be used to criticize the norms and practices of social institutions, as well as to call into question political assumptions that contribute to inequality and injustice.
One of the most renowned examples of this form of cultural jamming was created by the artist Banksy. In this section, we’ll look at several recent situations that have done the same thing.
Emma Sulkowicz and Rape Culture
Emma Sulkowicz launched her performance piece and senior thesis project “Mattress Performance: Carry That Weight” at Columbia University in New York City in September 2014 as a way to draw critical attention to the university’s mishandling of disciplinary proceedings for her alleged rapist, as well as the university’s mishandling of sexual assault cases in general. The university’s mishandling of disciplinary proceedings for her alleged rapist, as well as the university’s mishandling of sexual assault cases The Columbia Spectator quoted Emma as saying that the piece is intended to bring her private experience of rape and humiliation in the aftermath of her attack into the public domain, as well as to physically conjure the psychological weight she has been carrying since the alleged assault.
Emma said that she would continue to “carry the weight” in public until her accused rapist was either expelled or removed from college.
As a result of Emma’s daily performance, not only did she bring her alleged assault into the public eye, but it also “jammed” the notion that sexual assault and its consequences are private matters, and it brought to light the reality that they are frequently hidden from view due to the shame and fear that survivors experience.
Emma’s act, in sociological terms, contributed to lessen the taboo on admitting and discussing the pervasive problem of sexual violence on college campuses by upsetting the social norms of normal campus conduct on Emma’s university.
As a result of her culture-jamming performance piece, Emma garnered a great deal of media attention, and fellow Columbia students and alumni joined her in “carrying the weight” on a regular basis.
Black Lives Matter and Justice
Meanwhile, protesters in St. Louis, Missouri, demanded justice for Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager who was killed by a Ferguson, Missouri, police officer named Darren Wilson on August 9, 2014. Emma was carrying “that weight” around Columbia’s campus at the same time as protesters halfway across the country in St. Louis, Missouri, demanded justice for Michael Brown, who was 18 at the time of his death.
A charge against Wilson had not yet been filed, and protests had erupted in Ferguson in the days following the shooting. Ferguson, which is a mostly Black community with a mainly White police department, has a history of police harassment and violence.
“Which Side Are You On?” Protest
While listening to the St. Louis Symphony’s performance of Johannes Brahms’ Requiem on October 4, an ethnically and racially diverse group of vocalists rose from their seats and sang the iconic Civil Rights hymn “Which Side Are You On?” as the intermission came to a close. In a beautiful and mournful performance, protestors addressed the largely White crowd with the song’s title question and pleaded, “Justice for Mike Brown is justice for us all,” in response to the song’s title question. In a video recording of the event, some audience members can be seen looking on with disapproval, while many more applaud the performers.
The unexpected, inventive, and attractive character of this culture-jamming protest contributed to its effectiveness.
In situations where social norms are violated in places where they are generally tightly adhered to, we have a tendency to notice and concentrate on the violation, which makes this type of culture jamming successful.
In a powerful way, the performance served to remind those who are not burdened by racism that the community in which they live is currently under attack by racist forces on all fronts: in a physical and institutional sense, and on an ideological level, and that, as members of that community, they have a responsibility to fight those forces.
Culture Jamming at Its Best
Both of these performances, by Emma Sulkowicz and the demonstrators in St. Louis, are excellent instances of cultural jamming at its finest level. They take people who see them by surprise with their disruption of social norms, and in doing so, they call into question the validity of those very norms as well as the legitimacy of the institutions that organize and enforce them. Each provides a pertinent and profoundly essential reflection on problematic societal issues, and each requires us to address that which is more readily brushed aside than confronted directly.
What Do You Mean By “Culture Jamming”?”: An Interview with Moritz Fink and Marilyn DeLaure (Part One) — Henry Jenkins
Both of these performances, by Emma Sulkowicz and the demonstrators in St. Louis, are excellent instances of cultural jamming at its finest point. Those who see them are taken aback by their breach of societal norms, and in doing so, they call into question the validity of those norms as well as the legitimacy of the organizations that organize them. In each, we are presented with a contemporary and profoundly essential perspective on problematic societal issues, forcing us to confront that which is more readily ignored.
Having a visceral reaction to the social challenges of our day is vital because it marks the beginning of the process of making real and lasting social change.
The New Culture Jamming: How Activists Will Respond to Online Advertising
The following is an example of what the next wave of anti-corporate action may look like. It’s referred to as Big Dada: making a lot of noise to get people’s attention. A phenomenon known as “cultural jamming” gained in popularity and complexity during the 1990s. Its goal was to undermine consumer culture by infusing subversive ideas into corporate advertising and marketing materials. Consequently, in the picture above, a Coca Cola sign has been vandalized in order to draw attention to the company’s other imperative, which is love.
- Culture jammers would utilize the power of brands against themselves in order to disrupt society.
- Culture jammers took advantage of the widespread belief among many on the American (and worldwide) left that corporations wielded (and continue to wield) too much power, and that advertising was a particularly effective expression of that power.
- The practice of active cultural jamming was always considered a niche activity, but in the absence of active participation with brand shifts, ignorance was regarded the next best strategy.
- Being unaware of advertising has long been seen as a moral virtue; it implied that one was not subjected to the corporate paradigm, among other things.
- Now fast forward to today’s environment, when an increasing proportion of advertising is being delivered online.
- However, in the internet world, the advertising structure has evolved significantly.
- Second, the effectiveness of Google and Facebook advertisements is judged on a cost-per-click basis.
In other words, the conventional tactic of passive opposition to corporate dominance – ignoring advertisements – costs the advertisers absolutely nothing.
Money from advertisers is spent on people who find their advertisements “relevant” and who are receptive to the company’s marketing strategies.
Whatever personal pleasure one may have from Add-Art, it is not contributing to the betterment of society in general.
I predict that activists will discover that the most effective strategy to undermine corporate authority on the Internet is to begin engaging with the advertisements that they are being shown and muddying the data that is being gathered.
As a result, according to current pricing, clicking on any Google advertisement, such as a mortgage-related one, would cost the firm that placed the advertisement more than $1.
The search term “Jumbo mortgage” has an average cost-per-click of $2.42 (and you’ll see advertisements for Citi, Union, and Fremont banks on the search results page).
(presumably because those searches are more serious).
However, a million people’s clicks would enough.
Additionally, this is a type of online activism that is more similar in character to Anonymous’ well-known distributed denial-of-service assaults than it is to street demonstrations.
It is estimated that around ten percent of all clicks on Google advertising are being committed by different bad actors, generally bots or adware, with the goal of profiting from the small amount of money earned from sending clicks to Google.
(Keep in mind that the Move Your Money programme claims to have transferred around $50 million from large banks to credit unions.) This sort of activity, on the other hand, would not be considered click fraud if it were not carried out by automated means.
Window browsing masquerading as activism, sucking up corporate resources in the name of political activity.
If a large enough number of people were to appear interested in house mortgages despite the fact that they were not truly interested in home mortgages, it may begin to impair their capacity to properly target customers with behavioral advertisements.
Following the media exposure that Occupy Wall Street received last year, the movement’s attempts to resurrect itself in May have failed to gain traction.
How long will it take before they recognize that many firms are more valuable for their data than they are for their physical presence?
Banks are treasure troves of information that may be exploited for successful tactics. How long will it take for activists to realize that making their data more difficult to examine may be a useful political tool? It’s referred to as Big Dada: making a lot of noise to get people’s attention.
This is a sneak peek at what the next wave of anti-corporate protest may resemble. As Big Dada would say, it’s all about making a lot of noise to get people to pay attention. ” Culture jamming” is a phenomenon that gained in popularity and sophistication throughout the 1990s period. Through the transformation of corporate advertising into subversive messages, it hoped to undermine consumer culture in the process. A Coca Cola sign has been vandalized, for example, in order to highlight the company’s other imperative, which is not love as previously stated.
People who engage in culture jamming utilize the power of companies against themselves.
Taking advantage of the widespread belief among many on the American (and worldwide) left that corporations had (and still have) too much power, and that advertising was a particularly effective means of expressing that power, culture jammers exploited the common dissatisfaction with corporate power.
- Aside from being a specialized practice, active cultural jamming was always regarded the next best strategy in the absence of active participation with brand change.
- Historically, being unaware of advertising was regarded as a moral virtue since it implied that one was not subjected to the corporate paradigm, among other benefits.
- Forward to today’s world, when a rising percentage of advertising is being delivered online.
- However, in the internet world, the advertising structure has altered.
- First and foremost, the effectiveness of Google and Facebook advertisements is determined by what is known as “cost-per-click.” Instead than charging advertisers based on how many people view their advertisements, they charge advertisers based on how many people click on them.
- The distribution of such advertisements becomes more efficient as a result of this practice.
- Furthermore, because to the private nature of the browsing experience, there is no practical method to deface or change an ad in order to make a political message to those who are viewing it.
Yes, anti-corporate memes do exist, but they are not a direct response to the advertisements that Bank of America displays when you search for mortgages.) I predict that activists will discover that the most effective approach to undermine corporate authority on the Internet is to begin engaging with the advertisements that they are being shown and muddying the data that is being gathered by the companies themselves.
- According to the paradoxical logic of internet advertising, each and every time someone clicks on an ad, the advertiser incurs monetary loss.
- Other banking-related keywords are also becoming more expensive to rank in search engines like Google.
- $5 is the asking price for “mortgage calculator” (presumably because those searches are more serious).
- A million people’s clicks, on the other hand, would be beneficial.
- Individuals might take part in it without having to leave their computers, and it would not be difficult to develop tools that would assist activists in coordinating their actions.
- When you consider Google’s $37 billion in income in 2011, it’s likely that the business will have to repay that money to advertising, which means it will be a substantial number.
- The fact that this sort of activism is being conducted by robots makes it different from click fraud.
- Window browsing masquerading as activism, sapping corporate resources in the name of political activity.
- In the event that a large enough number of people began to appear interested in house mortgages while in fact being uninterested in home mortgages, it may begin to impair their capacity to effectively target consumers with behavioral advertising.
- Occupy Wall Street gained national prominence last year, but the movement’s efforts to resurrect itself in May have failed to gain traction.
- Will it be long before they recognize that many firms are more valuable for their data than they are for their physical presence?
How long will it take for activists to realize that making their data more difficult to examine might be a useful political tactic in their arsenal? As Big Dada would say, it’s all about making a lot of noise to get people to pay attention.
- Jürgen Habermas’ The Theory of Communicative Action was published in 1985. (2002) Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? Boston: Beacon Press
- Holt, D. B. (2002) Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? Consumer Culture and Branding: A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 70-90
- Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W., eds (1996). The Dialectic of Enlightenment is a way of thinking on how to be more enlightened. Continuum Publishing Group, New York
- Kozinets, R. V. (2002) Is it possible for consumers to get out of the market? Luminaries of Emancipation from the Burning Man festival. Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 29, Number 1, Pages 20-38
- Kozinets, R. V., and Handelman, J. M. (2004) Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 29, Number 1, Pages 20-38. Social Communication in Advertising: Persons, Products, and Images of Well-Being (1990)
- Leiss, W., Klein, S., and Jhally, S. (1990). Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 31, Number 4. London, UK: Routledge
- Rumbo, J. D. (2002) Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbuster. New York: Routledge. Market Mythology and Discourses of Power, in Thompson, C. J. (2004) Marketplace Mythology and Discourses of Power, in Psychology and Marketing 19(2): 127-48
- Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 162–80
Return to the top of the page to return to the Sociology of Culture.
Urban Dictionary: culture jam
Culture jamming is the act of using existing media, such as billboards, bus advertisements, posters, and other advertisements, to comment on those very media or on society in general, while employing the original medium’s communication method to make a point about those very media or society in general. Advertising, according to this theory, is little more than propaganda for established interests, and there is little way to avoid being subjected to this propaganda in industrialized countries.
The term “cultural jamming” is derived from the concept of radio jamming, which holds that public frequencies can be hijacked and subverted for the purpose of independent communication or to disrupt dominant frequencies, respectively.
It was first used by Kalle Lasn, the creator of AdBusters magazine.
Its origins may be traced back to the German idea of spassguerilla as well as the Situationist International.
Culture Jamming: Subversion as Protest
Many of today’s most pressing political battles are not defined by conflict between citizens and government, but rather by confrontation between customers and companies. The opioid epidemic caused by the pharmaceutical business, the obesity epidemic caused by Big Food, and the climate catastrophe caused by the fossil fuel industry are all indicators of industry’s widespread effect on the present world order. In 2018, private corporations accounted for 157 of the world’s wealthiest 200 organizations.
- According to Canadian writer John Ralston Saul, affluent CEOs are rewriting the laws of the worldwide economy, resulting in a “coup d’état in slow motion” that is taking place throughout the world.
- According to the private sector, the primary public function of the citizen is that of a consumer, and the most prevalent method of communication is that of an advertiser, generally defined.
- This provides a hurdle for activists who want to bring about change under the current system.
- Advertising and image are the primary means through which companies communicate with the public, and as such, these outward-facing parts of their identities are also their weak points.
- “Culture jamming” is the term used to describe this strategy: By piggybacking on the corporate instruments of advertising for their own ends, jammers are able to get access to the power structures they are attempting to overthrow.
- Memes Speak a Language of Their Own It was first coined in 1984 by the alternative band Negativland to refer to the altering of existing visuals in order to enhance the messages of the jammers’ own, alternative messages.
During his Farewell Address in 1989, the 40th president stated that “man is not free until government is constrained.” Privatization policies that lowered corporate taxes while ignoring the public sector paved the way for an explosion of public-private partnerships that blurred the distinctions between the cultural and the economic spheres of activity.
- Public space in the broadest sense was suffocating with commercials; between the airwaves (TV), the soundwaves (radio), and the visual surroundings (billboards), corporate influence was nearly impossible to avoid.
- All of these issues served as the foundation for the culture jamming movement that erupted in the 1980s and 1990s, during which activists regularly tried to expose the hypocrisies or injustices that underlay alluring corporate advertising.
- “Absolut Nonsense” was the name of the Absolut brand vodka jammedas.
- The majority of anti-corporate activists lacked the means and contacts to effectively publicize their criticisms of unfair labor practices, environmental violations, and other corporate wrongdoing at the turn of the century.
- By seizing control of this self-promotional engine, culture jammers were able to force the firms in issue to foot the money for their own anti-corporate campaigns.
Mega-corporations were employing memes to impose their control over popular culture, as defined by Richard Dawkins as “condensed pictures that evoke visual, linguistic, musical, or behavioral connections.” Nike and athletic excellence; Coca-Cola and young enthusiasm; Apple and creativity; and many more brands are associated with things that are so well-known that they have become cliche.
- However, although these simulacra served the interests of businesses, they were also used as a weapon by activists aiming to expose the complexity of power relations.
- They replaced the written manifesto with their chosen form of discourse, which allowed them to say more about their opponents in less time, with greater efficiency, and — possibly — with greater persuasiveness than they could have done through words.
- There is surely something amusing about jams like ” Virginia Slime ” and cigarettes marketed as ” Utter Fool ” (rather than ” Ultra Kool”), which turn corporate messaging on its head and make people chuckle.
- During the anti-tobacco activism of the late twentieth century, nowhere has the spectrum of comedy been exploited with more success than in anti-tobacco advocacy.
In addition, other activists posed as salespeople for the “Scramel” cigarettes, which they said were “so fresh they’re offensive!” Another group of demonstrators, however, was speaking out against Big Tobacco with stronger and more explicit tones at the same time that culture jammers were presenting the Philip Morris camel’s phallic snout as a flaccid, impotent penis.
Rather of using the normal surgeon general’s warning, he substituted an aggressive message that read: “Struggle General’s Warning: Blacks and Latino are the primary scapegoats for illicit drugs, and the primary targets for legal drugs.” By acting on two levels at the same time, the finest cultural jams are able to manage and resolve this seeming difference between antics and political protest, and hence achieve greater success.
Initially, they appear to be extremely precise, attempting to penetrate the seductions of a particular advertisement’s seductive language.
A wide range of specific misdemeanors were identified in the anti-tobacco advertisements, ranging from misrepresentations about the risks of smoking, toirresponsible advertising directed at children and adolescents, to the manufactured association between cultural capital and their deadly product.
- And it was successful.
- It was required that cigarettes be packed with detailed health warnings and graphics that depicted some of smoking’s most horrible health repercussions by 1990, and tobacco advertising had been outlawed from television and radio.
- By 2010, the tobacco business had been completely destroyed.
- Culture jams possess an extraordinary, profoundly democratic power.
- In this sense, Lasn claimed, “we the people” have the ability to amend corporation charters by inserting our own provisions.
- Resistance in the Modern Era: Jamming Like It’s Jazz When it came to cultural jamming in the 1980s and 1990s, activists had a “stick it to the man” mindset that allowed them to picture themselves outside of the structures against which they were fighting.
- In today’s world, however, it is far more difficult to completely reject the influence of major companies, and Millennials and Gen-Zers may not even want to do so, according to some social scientists.
- Even the instruments of modern activism — social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter — are firmly entrenched in the corporate world of today.
- Since 2010, the number of so-called “business responsibility” initiatives has increased dramatically, many of which are cloaked in the language of environmental sustainability and social justice.
As Lance Bennett, director of the Center for Communication and Civic Engagement at the University of Washington, told the Human Rights Watch, “this is both a good and a negative thing.” The fact that corporate responsibility has become more institutionalized is a positive development; however, the fact that corporations can purchase a social license through advertising is a negative development.
- In general, since the turn of the century, the public’s relationships with the media have become significantly more complicated.
- During the time period when television was still the major medium of corporation-to-consumer information delivery, this was especially evident; television was completely passive, and those who disagreed had almost no remedy (or opportunity for conversation).
- The emergence of grassroots, alternative, and social media has, in a sense, democratized communication, despite the fact that corporations continue to have a disproportionate amount of access to major communication channels.
- It has also made the task of cultural jamming more difficult because of the “post-truth” nature of modern media.
- “There are real misinformation efforts running throughout the world.
- Activists, on the other hand, point out that it is not just the media environment that has changed, but also the stakes, which have increased.
- “We require severe surgery at the heart of our global system in order to begin reorienting this human endeavor in a new path,” Lasn said.
- “No is not enough,” as author and activist Naomi Klein has stated emphatically.
A different definition has been proposed more recently by theorists like Mark LeVine: “jamming,” as if activists were a group of jazz musicians riffing on an established piece of music, experimenting with it and expanding on it, and causing the piece to perform in ways it was never intended to do in the first place.
Fury, but make it a sexy rage The cultural moment has certainly changed since 1984, the Orwellian year when Negativland inadvertently introduced the vernacular of culture jamming to the public.
Although their underlying concepts have faded or become irrelevant, corporate imagery — such as signs, logos, slogans, and other graphics — has become more sophisticated and more integrated into every aspect of daily life.
This resistance should look different from the culture jams of decades past.
The fossil fuel sector, for example, continues to delay significant climate action by engaging in greenwashing practices.
Food companies are undermining efforts to combat childhood obesity by targeting them with highly personalized advertising.
Though it has become more diverse, culture jamming is still united by a common theme of reproduction, which has a reflective quality that mirrors the bewitchment of big advertisers.
As activists take on the corporate coup d’état, their view of the world must be cynical, furious, and humorous at the same time, but it must also be just as alluring as the market world they wish to demolish in order to be effective. Unsplash / Pawe Czerwiski is credited with this image.