Which Part Of The Culture Tends To Change Sooner

levels, system, manager, model, company, business, system

Photo courtesy of Kheng Guan Toh As individuals work together to achieve common goals, they form groups that eventually become organizations. Organizations grow more formal and institutionalized when goals become more defined and long-term in nature, and labor becomes more specialized, as well as more formal and institutionalized. Organizations have a tendency to take on a life of their own, and commonly held views, values, and practices emerge, distinguishing one organization from another and frequently influencing the success or failure of the company.

The best-selling book Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, written by William Ouchi in 1981, piqued even more people’s interest in organizational cultures.

In 1982, two other best-selling books, Terrance Deal and Allan Kennedy’sCorporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life and Thomas Peters and Robert Waterman’s In Search of Excellence, supported the idea that excellent companies tended to have strong cultures.

Organizational culture is influenced by the ideals of the founders, the industry and business environment, the national culture, and the vision and conduct of the senior leadership team, among other factors.

  1. Among the seven primary characteristics that define an organization’s culture, according to a 1994 study conducted by J.A.
  2. Jehn are innovation, stability (maintaining the status quo versus growth), people orientation, outcome orientation, easygoingness, detail orientation, and team orientation, among others.
  3. A dominant culture is one that is shared by the majority of the organization.
  4. Strong organizational cultures are ones in which the essential values of the dominant culture are passionately believed by a large majority of the organization’s members, as opposed to weak organizational cultures.

But organizations with strong cultures may be less adaptable to change, may erect obstacles to diversity, and may have difficulty integrating new employees. They may also have difficulty integrating new employees into existing organizations.


It is possible to use a variety of methods inside an organization that help to maintain a company’s culture while also measuring the cultural fit between the organization and its personnel. Selection, performance assessment, training, and career development are just a few of the human resource procedures that help to promote the organization’s overall culture. Employees’ work conventions, communication methods, and philosophical viewpoints are all influenced by the ideas held by their employers, according to research.

  • If employees do not adjust effectively, they will experience increased pressure from their managers as well as from their peers who have become more used to their new environment.
  • Employees who understand and support the organization’s values, on the other hand, have a stronger foundation from which to make decisions that are consistent with the company’s objectives.
  • When the vast majority of workers understand and accept the organization’s standards, less time is spent explaining, educating, and gaining consensus before attempting something new and different.
  • In addition, employees who have been successfully acclimated find their work more important since they feel that they are a part of something greater than themselves.
You might be interested:  What Is Woke Culture Mean


Organizations frequently communicate cultural values directly through mission statements or corporate credos, or to a lesser extent, through slogans, logos, and advertising campaigns, among other methods. Leaders and managers also demonstrate what the organization values via their words and actions, as well as by the rewards they provide, the people they recruit as allies, and the methods they use to urge employees to comply. Other aspects of culture are represented implicitly through symbols and symbolic behavior, such as: Meeting procedures, greeting behavior, space allocation and utilization, and status symbols are just a few examples of areas in which organizational norms might arise.

  • A selection of cultural traits that management is both aware of and proud of are communicated to new employees during the normal new-employee orientation given by firms.
  • For example, an orientation would seldom state directly that the company’s culture encourages neglect of one’s personal life and that a 60-hour work week is required, despite the fact that these expectations are relatively uncommon in corporate culture.
  • This is not something that can be learned in a single session; staff must be on the lookout for signals that the rules are changing.
  • Employees who pay attention learn about them faster than others.
  • As an example, they may observe the repercussions of other people’s mistakes in order to draw judgments about proper behavior.
  • For example, in certain businesses, the CEO’s office is adorned with several symbols of wealth, such as pricey original paintings or antiques.
  • In the first instance, a manager with additional sources of revenue may be able to buy similar status symbols, but it would be undesirable to flaunt them since doing so may be interpreted as competing with the company’s chief executive.
  • Even the physical layout of a plant carries cultural messages: for example, Is it a public space where everyone can see and be seen by everyone?
  • Are there any private offices available?

Have ergonomics and convenience been taken into consideration, or have they been ignored? Is there a sufficient number of neutral venues where individuals may gather to make choices and solve problems? Do the break rooms and lunch rooms encourage or discourage people from using them?


The concept of organizational cultures originated in ethnography, which is the study and description of human social cultures in their natural environment. Some of the lingo has been appropriated by researchers studying organizational culture. Individuals in communities took on specialized “roles,” such as king, priest, historian, or teacher, which were defined by their respective cultures. In organizations, jobs that are comparable to these arise. The historian or storyteller, for example, is typically a long-time employee who shares inspirational anecdotes about the company’s early years or its history with the audience.

You might be interested:  Which Of The Following Is An Example Of A Material Dimension Of Culture

This “organizational folklore” comprises anecdotes about the founder, a long-time CEO, a spectacular termination, or a person who ascended through the ranks extremely fast as a result of a characteristic highly prized by the company, among other things.

The success stories of an organization serve as “role models” for others who wish to follow in their footsteps.

Finally, some organizations may encourage “management by walking about,” in which managers spend regular individual one-on-one time away from their desks providing praise or criticism to employees.

Organizational culture, or “grapevine,” has a significant impact on the content, reliability, and influence of the informal network or “grapevine.” Although all organizations have both formal and informal communication networks, organizational culture has a significant impact on the content, reliability, and influence of the informal network or “grapevine.” When official routes of communication are constrained, the grapevine becomes a more important source of knowledge.

Aware of the importance of culture, leaders look for methods to tap into and monitor the grapevine, and they may even use the grapevine by adding information to it in some cases.


The culture of an organization is comprised of generally constant qualities that are built on firmly held ideals that are reinforced through a variety of organizational activities. Organizational culture, on the other hand, may be altered. When there is a significant setback, such as a financial crisis, or when there is a change in top management, cultural shifts are most likely to occur. Additionally, businesses that are younger and smaller in size, as well as organizations with a weak culture, are more adaptable to change.

  • Employees discover that the previous assumptions with which they were comfortable are no longer valid when leadership changes or when current leadership commits to change.
  • Culture transformation is implemented by an astute leadership team in a deliberate manner.
  • Leaders must also serve as role models for the new culture, as well as adapt the organization’s structure and management methods in order to accommodate the new environment.
  • It is possible that transition will be reasonably easy when change is introduced in a way that does not raise dread and anger.
  • Kotter and J.L.
  • A good illustration of when firms must adjust their culture is when they become global in nature.

Aside from linguistic differences, employees bring to work a wide range of fundamentally different assumptions about topics such as the dignity of work, the proper relationship between employee and supervisor, the importance of initiative, the treatment of unwelcome information, and the voicing of complaints, among others.

You might be interested:  Why Was Blood Sacrifice Central To Aztec Culture

An organization’s chances of success in foreign markets are jeopardized if it fails to adapt.

Culture is communicated in a variety of ways, both explicitly and implicitly.

It is also important for veteran staff to be mindful of cultural shifts, particularly when the leadership changes.

The financial performance of an organization over the long term may be improved by a strong culture that is linked with the strategic framework of the business and is adaptable to environmental changes. JeanetteW.Gilsdorf Dr.Fraya Wagner-Marsh has revised the manuscript.


Chatman, J.A., and Jehn, K.A. (2001). Assessment of the link between industry features and organizational culture: How different may you be from the norm? The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 5, 1994, pp. 522–553. David, Stanley M., Managing Corporate Culture. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984. Deal, Terrence E., and Allan A. Kennedy authored this article. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life is a book about corporate cultures.

The editors of this volume are Peter J Frost, Larry F Moore, Meryl R.

Lundberg, and Joanne Martin.

Moore, Meryl R.

Lundberg, and Joanne Martin Organizational Culture is defined as follows: Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1985.

Graf, has written a book titled “Building Corporate Cultures.” The Chief Executive, March 2005, page 18.

Software of the Mind describes cultures and organizations as “softwares of the mind.” McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 1991.

Saxton, and Roy Serpa are the editors of this volume.

Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1985.

Kotter and J.L.

Corporate Culture and Performance are intertwined.

Ivany are co-authors of this work.

“A thriving culture may contribute to the success of a franchise system.” 75–77 in the February 2005 issue of Franchising World.

Oden discusses how to manage corporate culture, innovation, and intrapreneurship.

William G.

“Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge,” a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Panico, C.

“Culture’s Competitive Advantage.” Harvard Business Review.

12 (December 2004): 58–60.

12 (December 2004).

Waterman, Jr., “In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies.” In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies.

Schein, Edgar H., “Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View,” in Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View.

The Influence of Organizational Climate and Culture, edited by Benjamin Schneider, is available online.

Sensemaking in Organizations, by Karl E. Weick, Ph.D. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1995. Gordon Wright is a writer who lives in the United Kingdom. “Realigning the Culture” is a phrase that means “realigning the people.” 46, no. 1 (January 2005), pp. 26–34.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *