Which Of The Following Are The Observable Indicators Of Organizational Culture

12.2 Understanding Organizational Culture – Fundamentals of Leadership

  1. Define the culture of the company. Recognize the significance of organizational culture in your organization. Acquaint yourself with the various layers of organizational culture

What Is Organizational Culture?

It is a system of shared assumptions, values, and beliefs that instructs employees on what constitutes proper and wrong behavior. Organizational culture may be defined as follows: (ChatmanEunyoung, 2003; KerrSlocum Jr., 2005). These principles have a significant impact on employee behavior as well as on the overall effectiveness of the firm. According to Peters and Waterman’s best-selling bookIn Search of Excellence, the term “organizational culture” first gained widespread recognition in the 1980s, when they made the argument that company success could be attributed to an organizational culture that was decisive, customer focused, empowering, and people focused.

Organizational culture, on the other hand, is still a relatively new idea.

  1. Individuals are largely unaware of the existence of culture.
  2. This is something you can attest to if you have worked in a variety of organizations.
  3. In a meeting, it was entirely unacceptable to challenge your employer; such behavior would only be allowed in private conversations.
  4. To illustrate, consider the difference between one firm and another where staff dress more casually.
  5. It is more vital to find the best answer to any situation than it is to keep one’s first opinion.
  6. Additionally, you are not expected to work at night or on weekends unless there is a deadline to meet with your supervisor.

Why Does Organizational Culture Matter?

The culture of a company may be one of its most valuable assets, as well as one of its most significant liabilities. In fact, it has been claimed that firms that have a unique and difficult-to-copy organizational culture gain a competitive advantage as a result of having such a culture (Barney, 1986). When asked about the importance of corporate culture for company performance in a poll performed by the management consulting firm BainCompany in 2007, international business executives said it was just as essential as corporate strategy (Why culture can mean life or death, 2007).

Increased performance may be associated with an organization’s culture, or with the values that are held by all members of the company.

At the same time, it is critical to establish a business culture that is compatible with the needs of the firm’s environment, as described above.

As an example, if a firm is in the high-tech area, having an organizational culture that supports innovativeness and flexibility can help the company perform better.

In other words, just as having the “correct” culture may provide a competitive advantage for an organization, having the “wrong” culture can cause performance problems, may be a contributing factor to organizational failure, and may function as a barrier to the company’s ability to change and take risks.

Organizational culture, rather than rules and regulations, is a more effective means of controlling and managing employee behavior than these latter.

As an alternative, cultivating a culture of customer service achieves the same purpose by encouraging staff to think like consumers, with the understanding that the company’s priorities in this scenario are crystal clear: Keeping the consumer satisfied is more important than other considerations, such as minimizing the cost of a refund.

Levels of Organizational Culture

Components of organizational culture that are more obvious to the public are there, but there are other aspects that are less visible and may be hidden from one’s conscious awareness. Organizational culture may be conceived of as consisting of three layers that are interconnected with one another (Schein, 1992). 12.2 Schematic representation of the figure Organizational culture may be divided into three categories. The following is an adaptation of Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership are important considerations.

Fundamental assumptions exist at the most fundamental level, just under human consciousness.

Values are present on the second level.

Finally, we have artifacts, which are visible, concrete parts of corporate culture that can be seen and touched.

Assumptions such as social equality, high-quality relationships, and having a good time could be translated into values such as these: Such ideals could be reflected in artifacts such as an executive “open door” policy, an office layout that incorporates open spaces and meeting places equipped with pool tables, and a company picnic policy that is regularly implemented in the workplace.

Instead, monitoring the physical environment, employee interactions, corporate regulations, reward systems, and other visible elements of the organization may be the first step toward understanding the firm’s culture.

However, just examining these visible characteristics is unlikely to provide a comprehensive understanding of the organization’s operations.

Observing how employees interact and making choices can reveal the values and, at a deeper level, the assumptions that shape an organization’s culture.

Key Takeaway

Individuals inside an organization can better grasp which actions are and are not suitable within an organization when they are exposed to the common assumptions, values, and beliefs that exist within the organization. Organizations’ cultures may be a source of competitive advantage if they are designed properly.

Organizations with strong organizational cultures can function as both an organizing and a governing mechanism. In the ultimate analysis, organizational culture may be divided into three categories: assumptions, which are found below the surface of the organization, values, and artifacts.

References

Arogyaswamy, B., and Byles, C. H. Arogyaswamy, B., and Byles, C. H. (1987). Internal and external fit in terms of organizational culture Journal of Management, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 647–658. J. B. Barney & Sons, Inc. (1986). The ability of an organization’s culture to be a source of sustainable competitive advantage has been questioned. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 656–665. S. Eunyoung Cha, J. A. Chatman, and J. A. Chatman (2003). Culture is a powerful tool for leadership.

  • 45, no.
  • 19–34 Kerr, J., Slocum, J.
  • W., Jr.
  • Corporate culture is managed through the use of incentive schemes.
  • Heskett, J.
  • P.
  • The relationship between corporate culture and performance.

Marcoulides, G.

H.

(1993, May).

Organizational Science, vol.

2, pp.

E.

Schein, et al (1992).

Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

Stegmeier, D.

Innovations in office design: Taking a critical influence approach to creating productive work spaces.

Why culture can make or break a company’s success or failure is explained.

15.2 Understanding Organizational Culture

  1. Define the culture of the company. Recognize the significance of organizational culture in your organization. Acquaint yourself with the various layers of organizational culture

What Is Organizational Culture?

A system of shared assumptions, attitudes, and ideas that instructs employees on what constitutes proper and wrong behavior is referred to as organizational culture. These principles have a significant impact on employee behavior as well as on the overall effectiveness of the firm. According to Peters and Waterman’s best-selling bookIn Search of Excellence, the term “organizational culture” first gained widespread recognition in the 1980s, when they made the argument that company success could be attributed to an organizational culture that was decisive, customer focused, empowering, and people focused.

  • Organizational culture, on the other hand, is still a relatively new idea.
  • Individuals are largely unaware of the existence of culture.
  • This is something you can attest to if you have worked in a variety of organizations.
  • In a meeting, it was entirely unacceptable to challenge your employer; such behavior would only be allowed in private conversations.
  • To illustrate, consider the difference between one firm and another where staff dress more casually.
  • It is more vital to find the best answer to any situation than it is to keep one’s first opinion.
  • Additionally, you are not expected to work at night or on weekends unless there is a deadline to meet with your supervisor.

Using these two hypothetical organizations as examples, we can see how distinct cultures exist inside organizations and how culture influences what is proper and acceptable conduct as well as what is wrong and unacceptable behavior.

Why Does Organizational Culture Matter?

The culture of a company may be one of its most valuable assets, as well as one of its most significant liabilities. In fact, it has been claimed that firms that have a unique and difficult-to-copy organizational culture gain a competitive advantage as a result of having such a culture. According to a poll performed by the management consulting company BainCompany in 2007, international business executives rated corporate culture as being as essential as corporate strategy in terms of achieving success in the marketplace.

You might be interested:  What Are The Element Of Culture

Increased performance may be associated with an organization’s culture, or with the values that are held by all members of the company.

At the same time, it is critical to establish a business culture that is compatible with the needs of the firm’s environment, as described above.

As an example, if a firm is in the high-tech area, having an organizational culture that supports innovativeness and flexibility can help the company perform better.

In other words, just as having the “correct” culture may provide a competitive advantage for an organization, having the “wrong” culture can cause performance problems, may be a contributing factor to organizational failure, and may function as a barrier to the company’s ability to change and take risks.

Organizational culture, rather than rules and regulations, is a more effective means of controlling and managing employee behavior than these latter.

As an alternative, cultivating a culture of customer service achieves the same purpose by encouraging staff to think like consumers, with the understanding that the company’s priorities in this scenario are crystal clear: Keeping the consumer satisfied is more important than other considerations, such as minimizing the cost of a refund.

Levels of Organizational Culture

Components of organizational culture that are more obvious to the public are there, but there are other aspects that are less visible and may be hidden from one’s conscious awareness. Organizational culture may be conceived of as consisting of three layers that are interconnected with one another. Figure 15.3There are three layers of organizational culture to consider. The following is an adaptation of Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership are important considerations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

  1. When assumptions are made, they represent views about human nature and reality that are taken for granted.
  2. Values are a set of principles, norms, and objectives that everyone adheres to.
  3. For example, in a company, one of the fundamental beliefs that employees and managers hold is that satisfied employees are beneficial to their employers.
  4. Consider Alcoa, who constructed its headquarters to reflect the principles of making employees more visible and accessible as well as promoting teamwork, among other things.
  5. It is absolutely a good idea to observe the physical surroundings, people’s clothing choices, where they rest, and how they interact with one another while you are applying for a position to get a sense of the company’s culture while you are there.
  6. A significant portion of what constitutes culture resides below the level of consciousness of the individual.

Inquiring about employees’ beliefs and perceptions about what is right and appropriate behavior can also reveal the values and assumptions that shape an organization’s culture.

Key Takeaway

Individuals inside an organization can better grasp which actions are and are not suitable within an organization when they are exposed to the common assumptions, values, and beliefs that exist within the organization. Organizations’ cultures may be a source of competitive advantage if they are designed properly. Organizations with strong organizational cultures can function as both an organizing and a governing mechanism. In the ultimate analysis, organizational culture may be divided into three categories: assumptions, which are found below the surface of the organization, values, and artifacts.

Exercises

  1. What is the importance of culture in businesses? In your company’s culture, please give an example of both a positive and a negative feature. When it comes to governing mechanisms, how does culture play a role? Why are assumptions important if they are hidden under the surface? Examples of artifacts you have observed at various organizations should be discussed.

Understanding Organizational Culture

“Understanding Organizational Culture,” section 8.1 from the book Management Principles, is adapted from the original (v. 1.0). For more information about it (including license), please visit this page. Please check the project’s main page for further information about the source of this book, as well as the reasons why it is being made accessible for free. There is also the option to explore or download other books. Simply click here to download a.zip file containing this book so that you may read it offline.

Consider forwarding it to others: Music, education, and other forms of open culture are supported under Creative Commons.

DonorsChoose.org is a website that allows people like you to assist teachers in funding their classroom projects, which might range from art materials to books to calculators.

8.1Understanding Organizational Culture

  1. Define the culture of the company. Recognize the significance of organizational culture in your organization. Acquaint yourself with the various layers of organizational culture

What Is Organizational Culture?

Organizational culture is defined as a system of shared assumptions, values, and ideas that instructs employees on what constitutes proper and wrong behavior in the organization. refers to a set of common ideas, values, and beliefs that guide individuals in determining what is suitable and inappropriate conduct to exhibit. S. Eunyoung Cha, J. A. Chatman, and J. A. Chatman (2003). Culture is a powerful tool for leadership. California Management Review, 45, 19–34; Kerr, J., and Slocum, J. W. California Management Review, 45, 19–34; (2005).

Academe of Management Executive, volume 19, number 1, pages 130–138.

According to Peters and Waterman’s best-selling bookIn Search of Excellence, the term “organizational culture” became popular in the 1980s when they argued that company success could be attributed to an organizational culture that was decisive, customer-oriented, empowerment-oriented, and people-oriented.

  • Organizational culture is a notion that is still in its early stages.
  • Individuals are typically unaware of their cultural heritage, just as the water is usually unaware of the creatures that swim in it.
  • It has a connection to the second of the three aspects that make up the P-O-L-C function of planning, organizing, and controlling.
  • A tight relationship exists between organizational design and the culture of the company.

A culture that supports the organizational structure (and vice versa) can, on the other hand, be extremely effective.

Why Does Organizational Culture Matter?

The culture of a business may either be one of its most valuable assets or one of its most significant liabilities. As a matter of fact, some have suggested that firms with a culture that is unique and difficult to replicate have a competitive edge. J. B. Barney & Sons, Inc. (1986). The ability of an organization’s culture to be a source of sustainable competitive advantage has been questioned. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 656–665. According to a poll performed by the management consulting company BainCompany in 2007, international business executives believe that corporate culture is just as essential as corporate strategy in terms of achieving economic success.

  1. This was written in September of 2007.
  2. This comes as no surprise to business owners and executives who are eager to credit their company’s success to the culture that has developed inside their corporation.
  3. Mick Stevens, a cartoonist from cartoonbank.com All Intellectual Property Rights are Reserved.
  4. When it comes to key success measures such as revenues, sales volume, market share, and stock prices, the researchers discovered a link between organizational cultures and firm performance.
  5. P.
  6. L.
  7. Marcoulides, G.
You might be interested:  What Is Low Context Culture

H.

A model for understanding organizational culture and performance is proposed and tested.

4, no.

209–225.

Insofar as shared values are appropriate for the particular organization in issue, corporate performance may be enhanced as a result of culture.

Arogyaswamy and C.

Byles, 1987.

Journal of Management, vol.

6, pp.

As an example, if a firm is in the high-tech area, having an organizational culture that supports innovativeness and flexibility can help the company perform better.

In other words, just as having the “correct” culture may provide a competitive advantage for an organization, having the “wrong” culture can cause performance problems, may be a contributing factor to organizational failure, and may function as a barrier to the company’s ability to change and take risks.

It is an effective control mechanism that dictates how employees behave.

In the case of an organization attempting to enhance the quality of its customer service, rules may not be beneficial, particularly when the difficulties that consumers raise are unique to the organization.

Keeping the consumer satisfied is more important than other considerations, such as minimizing the cost of a refund.

Consequently, the capacity to recognize and impact organizational culture is a vital skill for managers to have in their toolkit when performing their regulating, organizing, and leading functions simultaneously.

Levels of Organizational Culture

Organizational Culture Can Be Divided into Three Levels (Figure 8.4) The following is an adaptation of Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership are two important aspects of running a successful business. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. Components of organizational culture that are more obvious to the public are there, but there are other aspects that are less visible and may be hidden from one’s conscious awareness. Organizational culture may be conceived of as consisting of three layers that are interconnected with one another.

  • H.
  • Organizational culture and leadership are important considerations.
  • Fundamental assumptions are beliefs about human nature and reality that are held in the deepest recesses of our consciousness and are taken for granted.
  • Values exist at the second level, as do shared principles, standards, and objectives.
  • Finally, we have artifacts that are visible on the surface.
  • Egalitarianism, high-quality relationships, and having a good time are examples of values that might be expressed in this way.
  • Learning about the culture of a business might begin with an examination of its artifacts, which may include the physical environment, employee interactions, corporate regulations, incentive systems, and other readily apparent aspects.
  • However, focusing just on these visible components is unlikely to provide a comprehensive picture of the organization’s culture, as a substantial portion of what constitutes culture remains below the level of consciousness of the average person.

Key Takeaway

Individuals may better grasp which actions are permissible and which behaviors are not appropriate inside an organization by understanding the assumptions, values, and beliefs that are held by the organization as a whole. Organizations’ cultures may be a source of competitive advantage if they are designed properly.

Organizations with strong organizational cultures can function as both an organizing and a governing mechanism. Finally, corporate culture may be divided into three categories: assumptions that lie under the surface, values, and artifacts (or physical manifestations).

Exercises

  1. What is the importance of culture in businesses? In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of an organization’s culture? When it comes to governing mechanisms, how does culture play a role? Why are assumptions important if they are hidden under the surface? Examples of artifacts you have observed at various organizations should be discussed.

How to Tell if Your Company Has a Creative Culture

Thank you for your understanding. We’re in the process of modernizing our systems in order to better serve our subscribers. Unfortunately, this implies that we will have to cease subscription synchronization for the time being. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience. Hopefully, we’ll be back up and running in 48 hours! Let’s see if we can locate your subscription. Fill up the blanks with your subscription email address. Do you require assistance in gaining access? Contact customer service via phone: Phone number in the United States and Canada: 800-274-3214 In Asia and the Pacific, call +61 2 9158 6127.

  1. You have become a subscriber!
  2. You will need to confirm your subscriber details as well as enter your password.
  3. Password must be shown Passwords should be kept hidden.
  4. Have you forgotten your password?
  5. Your HBR.org subscription has been activated, and you now have access to all of your subscriber advantages.
  6. Have you forgotten your password?
  7. Have you forgotten your password?
  8. If your email address is registered with us, you will get a link to reset your password.
  9. Create one now.
  10. Do you require assistance in gaining access?

Observable Culture

The aggregate conduct of the people who belong to an organization constitutes the culture of that organization. There are several aspects that contribute to culture, including:

  • Values, visions, norms, working language, systems, symbols, beliefs, and habits are all important.

It is also the pattern of such collective actions and beliefs that are taught to new organizational members as a way of viewing the world, and even thinking and feeling about it and about themselves. Organizational culture has an impact on how individuals and groups interact with one another, with clients, and with other stakeholders. According to Ravasi and Schultz (2006), the culture of an organization is defined as the collection of shared mental assumptions held by the members of the organization.

Even while each firm has its own distinct culture, it is possible for bigger organizations to have various and competing cultures as a result of differences in the characteristics of different management teams.

The Definition Of Observable Culture

Culture that can be seen is simply defined as the elements of an organization’s cultural identity which are visible to the public. Examples of visible culture include the symbolic leadership of the company’s CEO, a corporate policy, or even a product. The values of a corporation have a significant effect in determining their observable culture. When a corporation takes a business decision to manufacture a product or deal with a problem, the visible culture is the mirror of that decision. The rituals and processes that take place within a firm are also considered to be visible culture.

Observable Culture

With each of their products, IBM established a noticeable corporate culture.

Developing a tool to understand corporate culture from the outside

Since May 2016, we have served as the project manager for an academic research project aimed at developing a new way to assessing company culture. The Unobtrusive Corporate Culture Analysis Tool was developed as a result of this research (UCCAT). UCCAT is a theoretically based and scientifically tested methodology for analyzing and benchmarking corporate culture that was developed by the University of Cambridge. For the first time, rather than gathering employee interviews and questionnaires to measure culture, UCCAT analyzes public data (such as annual reports, financial records, press releases, and databases) indicative of a company’s cultural “footprint” in order to determine its overall culture.

Essentially, each UIC reflects a visible and quantifiable part of organizational activity that is indicative of culture (e.g., research expenditure, customer interaction), and may be seen of as a “dipstick” into a company’s overall culture.

This is a novel approach.

This project intends to overcome these obstacles and to provide new insights to the academic corporate culture literature, as well as to develop a fresh scientifically assessed strategy for assisting investors in their investment decisions.

  1. A systematic review of the literature on organizational culture was conducted.
You might be interested:  The Dominant Values Of US Culture Include Which Of The Following

We examined 2,047 academic publications and discovered 329 non-obtrusive markers of cultural differences (UICs). These UICs were then conceptualized in terms of the basic aspects of organizational culture that have been identified as being predictive of performance in the academic literature, which were then applied to these UICs. Using reviews left by current and former employees on Glassdoor (a website where current and former employees provide unsolicited reviews of companies and company management), for example, it has been shown that employee satisfaction (an outcome of an employee-focused culture) is positively associated with firm performance in a nonintrusive manner.

  • Furthermore, by analyzing publicly accessible business data like as annual reports, earnings call transcripts, and press announcements, we were able to identify novel UICs that had not previously been recognized in the corporate culture literature.
  • We built an early UCCAT framework based on the information gathered over the preceding steps (76 UICs belonging to 8 dimensions).
  • Seven of the firms were regarded to be high-performers, while the other three were assessed to be underperformers.
  • The active voice was used in some sentences, which may have created a distorted effect by inserting the subject “We” in some words.
  • In the case of UCCAT, we investigated whether different coders would evaluate the same companies in a similar manner when applying the initial UCCAT framework to the ten companies under consideration.
  • Based on this study, as well as further statistical evaluations of each UIC (e.g., their variance and time required to code), we optimized the UCCAT algorithm even more.
  • They were evaluated to establish whether the profiles accurately represented the firms being reported on and whether they discriminated between high- and low-performing enterprises.
  • It is an unobtrusive Corporate Culture Assessment Tool (UCCAT) Final UCCAT tool comprises 60 unobtrusive indicators of culture (UICs), which are divided into six categories of corporate culture (see Figure 1).
  • Table 1 contains the definitions for each dimension, as well as a single UIC that represents that dimension.
Corporate culture dimension Example UIC How it is assessed
Adaptability:A company’s innovativeness, willingness to take risks, and overall ability to respond to changes in the market through strategy and leadership. R D intensity:R D expense as a percentage of net sales over 3 years (source: annual report). This is indicative of an organisation’s willingness to innovate. Positive indicator:Above industry competitors’ average over the past 3 years.Negative indicator:Below industry competitors’ average over the past 3 years.
Customer focus:A company’s emphasis on engaging with customers and responding to their wants and needs. Responsiveness on phone:Whether it is possible to get a human operator on the customer service line. This indicates accessibility to customers. Positive indicator:The caller gets through to a human operator.Negative indicator:The caller doesn’t get through to a human operator OR it’s not possible to locate a customer care number.
Employee focus:A company’s treatment of its employees in terms of support, opportunities for professional growth and concern for well-being, as well as employees’ subsequent alignment or non-alignment with its business direction. Employee strikes:Occurrence of employee strike action over a 5-year period (source: press releases). This indicates an unhappy workforce, or a lack of ability to negotiate settlements. Positive indicator:No strike in the past 5 years.Negative indicator:One or more strikes in the past 5 years.
Governance:The practises, composition and stability of a company’s planning surrounding their results, their responsibilities and the future. Adjusting CEO bonus:Adjusting CEO bonus payments according to actual company performance (source: annual report). This is indicative of whether rewards are calibrated to performance. Positive indicator:No/reduced bonusNegative indicator:Full bonus.
Planning:The extent and effectiveness of a company’s planning surrounding their results, their responsibilities and the future. No profit warnings:Presence of profit warnings in the past 2 years (source: Google news). This indicates inaccurate forecasting Positive indicator:No profit warning issued in the past 2 years.Negative indicator:One or more profit warnings issued in the past 2 years.
Transparency:The transparency of a company’s communications in terms of its annual report, responses to analysts’ questions in earning calls, and press releases. Responding to questions:Adequacy of responses given to analysts’ questions in the earnings call (source: earnings call). This indicates openness to directly answering about the organisation’s performance. Positive indicator:At least 50% of questions directly answered.Negative indicator:Less than 50% of questions directly answered.

As can be seen in Table 1, each UIC is assigned a score indicating whether it is positive or negative. If the data does not show a clear positive or negative trend, the UIC is classified as “indeterminate.” It is marked as missing if the information is not accessible. When all 60 UICs for a firm are assessed, this results in two crucial scores for that company. At the outset, each corporate culture attribute is rated in terms of positive UICs minus negative UICs for the organization as a whole (so 6 positive indicators minus 4 negative indicators would derive a score of 2).

To begin with, for a specific organization, an overall corporate culture score is calculated by subtracting the total number of positive UICs from the total number of negative UICs (so 40 positive indicators minus 20 negative indicators would derive a score of 20).

Conclusions based on the case studies Following the conclusion of the case studies, there are three important observations to make.

In the first instance, it appears that the corporate culture profiles provided by UCCAT are discriminatory amongst organizations.

Transparency, governance, and customer focus were also strong points for them, as evidenced by the fact that they have archived online archives of accessible corporate papers dating back 28 years.

Second, the UCCAT gives specialized insights into the corporate cultures of various organizations.

On the other hand, one of the worst organizations (e.g., in terms of governance, customer- and employee focus) did quite well on the transparency criterion.

Third, certain observations may be made concerning the patterns of UICs that exist for any individual organization.

Other UICs are concerned with signs that occur only infrequently yet are extremely problematic.

Furthermore, it is important to note that no one UIC or culture characteristic can be utilized to identify corporate culture.

Overall, UCCAT is a reliable, theoretically developed, and simple-to-use instrument that has enormous promise for assisting in the decision-making process of investment decisions as well as addressing crucial academic concerns about the nature and manifestation of organizational culture.

Our current research will be focused on testing the UCCAT on a larger sample of organizations over a longer period of time in order to discover whether it can predict independent measures of organizational success in the future. ♣♣♣ Notes:

  • The original version of this blog article published on [email protected] The AKO Foundation, a non-profit organization based in the United Kingdom, is funding the research. The opinions expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the stance of the LSE Business Review or the London School of Economics. Credit for the featured image goes to Imagebygeralt, who is using it under aCC0license. When you submit a comment, you are indicating your acceptance of our Comment Policy.

Tom Reader is an Associate Professor of Organizational Psychology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, and the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science’s Deputy Head (Research). A specialist in the relationship between organizational culture and risk management, his work examines the relationship between organizational culture and risk management. He is also an expert in the topics of safety culture, decision-making, teamwork, and incident reporting. Alex Gillespie is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science at the London School of Economics, as well as the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *