What Is White People Culture

What is white culture, exactly? Here’s what the stats say

A magical conversation took place a few months after I relocated to New York, and it would have a profound impact on the rest of my life. When I told a friend that I had visited his favorite shop, he inquired as to who had served me: “Who served you?” “Was it the tall white guy who did it?” “Are the rest of the staff members not white?” I inquired, a frown on my face. To which my friend responded, “Huh? “. What exactly do you mean? No. “I was just trying to describe him.” While he wandered off to get a beer, I stood there completely perplexed.

As a Brit, I grew up in a country where 86 percent of the population was white, so “white” was the accepted norm.

Crimewatch’s men were described as being black when they were in fact black, and as short or tall, thin or fat when they were in fact white, according to the show.

Non-whiteness is much more visible in this context, and the contrast between whiteness and non-whiteness is also much more visible.

You don’t notice the normalcy; you only notice the deviations from the normalcy.

But, if my friend is able to describe something with the adjective “white,” what exactly are they describing?

As a result, I decided to find out by asking the questions that I, along with many other non-white people, had been asked repeatedly.

Q: What do white people eat?A: Vegetables.

According to the most recent data from the United States Department of Agriculture, the average white American consumes 16lb more veggies at home per year than the average non-white American (that could add up to 112 medium-sized carrots, 432 cherry tomatoes, or God knows how much kale). The only thing that white people appear to enjoy more than veggies is dairy products, which is a curious phenomenon. White Americans consume 185lb of dairy products at home per year, but black Americans consume just 106lb of dairy goods at home.

As an example, according to a 2002 research, fruit and vegetable intake increases each time a new supermarket is opened in close proximity to a person’s house.

Similarly, that same study discovered that white Americans are four times more likely than black Americans to reside in a census tract with a supermarket than black Americans are.

Q: What do white people drink?A: Alcohol.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about a third of non-Hispanic whites had at least one day of excessive drinking in the previous year. Only 16 percent of African-Americans and 24 percent of Hispanic-Americans agreed with this assessment. Inquiring minds want to know what drinks white people are consuming, and a team of researchers who studied 2,171 females from the time they were 11 years old to the time they were 18 years old had the same curiosity. Researchers discovered that white girls consumed far more wine than black women as time progressed (andbeer, actually, and, er, spirits, too).

Q: What’s a typical white name? A: Joseph Yoder.

An examination of 270 million people’s last names was conducted by the Census Bureau in order to identify those that were most likely to be held by members of specific races or ethnicities. Yoder may not be the most popular last name in the United States – just around 45,000 people bear it – but, because 98.1 percent of those who bear it are white, it ranks slightly ahead of Krueger, Mueller, and Koch as the whitest last name in the country, according to the Pew Research Center. As a result, statistically speaking, the Yoders of America are the white individuals who are least likely to marry someone who is of a different color than themselves.

  • Mona Chalabi provided the illustration.
  • Mona Chalabi provided the illustration.
  • Mona Chalabi provided the illustration.
  • Mona Chalabi provided the illustration.
  • This appears to go opposed to my idea that white culture is intangible — Jewish culture, on the other hand, is anything but.
  • Still, the data is limited to New York and was collected between 2011 and 2014, making it difficult to draw conclusions.
  • This is because parents prefer to be more imaginative when they give birth to a female.

Q: What do white people do for fun? A: Enjoy the arts.

Amanda, a highly respected coworker and friend, was the next person I turned to and asked what she would like to know about white people. Amanda, who is also a white person, responded by asking, “Why do they have such a strong affection for guitars?” Unfortunately, despite two hours of online investigation, I was unable to prove her claim concerning the relationship between musical instruments and race. Even though I learned that bassoons are more popular among women than males, I was sent to a YouTube video of a lady playing the bassoon with the caption “THIS is how you bassoon.” My stomach hurt from laughing so hard that I had to take a break from writing this.

  • When the Bureau of Labor Statistics interviewed 10,500 people in the United States about how they spend their time, the results were released.
  • It’s only 36 seconds, but keep in mind that this is an average of 36 seconds every day, which adds up to 219 minutes per year.
  • The research revealed that white Americans were nearly twice as likely as black or Hispanic Americans to have participated in at least one arts activity in the previous year.
  • Mona Chalabi provided the illustration.
  • When I was growing up, my family and I never set foot inside a museum, gallery, or performing arts facility.
  • I didn’t think it was weird; rather, I felt it was similar to traveling in pairs or using coaches, which I believed was something intended for school excursions only.
  • Do you remember Amanda?

The next year, she conducted interviews with black psychiatrists to get their take on Rachel Dolezal, a white scholar who had purposefully disguised herself as an African American.

“But it’s not normal at her age.” As Thomas pointed out, many white teens engaged in a similar manner as Dolezal, striving to adopt what they considered to be the qualities of a different race while also exploring their own identities.

“For whiteyouth who are removed from European ancestry or legacy, it frequently feels like the idea of whiteness as a concept is meaningless,” Thomas said in a comment that has stayed with me for a long time.

It was assumed that Dolezal was a “outlier” in a “bizarre” situation, but she is actually a part of a larger pattern of white conduct.

It includes the millions of white Americans who have taken DNA testing and have boldly shown that they are, in fact, x percent non -white in origin.

One emotion could be amusing, while the other might be terrifying, but they are all ultimately about discovering an idea of whiteness that isn’t void of meaning or content.

I’m not sure I can provide a satisfactory response to the question “what is white culture?” but I believe we should make an attempt.

If the “somethingness” of white culture can never be fully defined, it will always be both “nothing, really” and “everything,” according to some.

A version of this piece will appear in the March issue of The Smudge magazine. Do you have any opinions about white culture? We would want to hear them! Please leave a comment below or send an email to [email protected] if you have any questions.

  • In this article, the incorrect information in the illustration showing the last names in America with the highest proportion of black people was substituted with the correct information on the 27th of February 2018. Additionally, the captions of the illustrations were amended to better reflect the information shown.

Opinion: There is no ‘White culture’

Richard Thompson Ford is the George E. Osborne Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, where he has taught for more than 30 years. His publications include “The Racial Card: How bluffing about racism makes race relations worse” and the forthcoming “Dress Codes: How the laws of fashion changed history.” He is also the author of other articles. View more opinion at CNN.com. The thoughts stated in the commentary are his own; see more opinion here. (CNN) In an unexpected misstep, the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC, posted a document titled “Aspects and Assumptions of Whiteness and White Culture.” The document purported to educate the viewer about how “White people and their traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized.

White culture is defined by the features of “rugged individualism,” “the nuclear family,” “rationalism,” the Protestant work ethic, conflict avoidance, and “written tradition,” according to a chart published in a 1978 book, which The Washington Post said originated from a 1978 book.

“I believe it would be a nice idea.” That is what comes to me when I think about “White Culture.” Mahatma Gandhi is reputed to have stated when asked what he thought of Western Civilization: “I think it would be an excellent idea.” The assumption that the culture in question is White, on the other hand, is a pretty terrible one to begin with.

In reaction to significant criticism, the museum was forced to delete the document, which was a good thing.

Even in the chart’s introductory line, which asserts that “we have all assimilated certain components of White culture – including people of color,” the flaws in this notion are evident.

You might be interested:  How Did Merchants Most Likely Influence Medieval Culture

Many people of color exhibit and in some cases exemplify “White culture,” but this does not explain why many White people do not: for example, the current White President of the United States demonstrates a marked lack of respect for science and the sanctity of the nuclear family – to say nothing of his aversion to confrontation.

  1. Naturally, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.
  2. Accusing King of having “internalized” his faith or his nonviolent ethic as a result of being forced to do so by a White power structure is an insult to his memory.
  3. People of all races, including African Americans, have made significant contributions to American culture that are comparable to those made by the stereotypical Mayflower pilgrims.
  4. One of the most distinguishing characteristics of White supremacy has been the taking of credit for the labor and accomplishments of other races, whether that labor was physical toil extracted without compensation or intellectual and cultural effort copied without acknowledgement.
  5. When it comes to the “written tradition,” several well-known White authors, such as Zora Neale Hurston, Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, and Gwendolyn Brooks, have included elements of literary traditions produced by Black writers, such as Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison.
  6. Whether or not Black folk developed “the sole American music,” as recognized by the famous Black philosopher, activist, and sociologist W.E.B.
  7. Without a doubt, the chart’s depiction of White culture is supposed to be insulting, and this is largely due to counter-cultural critiques of soulless American capitalism and stiff bourgeois respectability.
  8. However, in the end, this is almost as offensive and degrading as the first.

When it comes to an ideology of “rugged individualism” that has, at its worst, promoted alienation and selfishness, we share part of the guilt; when it comes to a devotion of the nuclear family that has stigmatized alternative forms of care and physical closeness, we share some of the blame as well.

It is the idea of White culture – indeed, the idea that any set of cultural practices can be assigned to any race – that ignores or dismisses the most important development in modern history: the cosmopolitan mixing of older, face-to-face cultures made possible by the expansion of communication and migration.

However, Black Americans are not displaced Africans who could return to their ancestral homeland – we, more than any other of America’s mistreated racial groups, are the children of modernity, a new people born in the violent encounter with avaricious and ambitious Europeans who forged a new identity and a new culture as a result of that traumatizing encounter with Europeans.

Even the concept of cultural practices as belonging to certain racial groupings is a misinterpretation of both race and culture.

However, it represents a widely held idea that races are constituted by separate cultural practices and customs.

Obviously, the logical conclusion to be derived from this is that “White culture” is in fact the culture of people of color as well; nonetheless, the graphic shows that White people, who “still wield the majority of institutional power in America,” pushed their culture on everyone else.

The larger issue is that the notion that “White culture” – individualism, the work ethic, the written tradition, rationalism, conflict avoidance, and so on – was imposed on, or passively “internalized” by people of color ignores the contributions and achievements of generations of industrious and self-sufficient Black scientists, philosophers, and writers, to say nothing of Black Protestants who made an ethic of non-violence a guiding feature of their lives.

Naturally, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.

A slap in the face to King’s religion and nonviolent ethics is to say that the White power system forced them onto him and that this resulted in his “internalization.” His beliefs, formed in the battle for Black freedom, are today an intrinsic part of both Protestant religion and popular morality in the United States and other parts of the world; additionally, he created them based on his own intelligence, experience, and research.

  1. People of all races, including African Americans, have made significant contributions to American culture that are comparable to those made by the stereotypical Mayflower pilgrims.
  2. It has always been a distinguishing characteristic of White supremacy to claim credit for other races’ efforts and successes, whether that labor was physical toil extracted without compensation or intellectual and cultural work copied without recognition.
  3. In a similar vein, when it comes to the “written tradition,” many well-known White authors have absorbed elements of literary traditions formed by Black writers such as Zora Neale Hurston, Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, and Gwendolyn Brooks into their own works.
  4. Whether or not Black folk developed “the sole American music,” as recognized by the famous Black philosopher, activist, and sociologist W.E.B.
  5. Without a doubt, the chart’s depiction of White culture is supposed to be insulting, and this is largely because of counter-cultural critiques of soulless American capitalism and stiff bourgeois respectability.
  6. Black responsibility is a corollary to the concept of “White culturerejection “‘s of Black success, which is a denial of Black responsibility itself.
  7. Given the fact that there is no such thing as a White culture – just an American culture – people of color ought to take a fair part of both the blame and the praise.
  8. In that sense, being a crucial part of a culture and a civilization involves not only having “internalized” it as passive victims, but also having been a part of it in all of its grandeur and horror as a participant.
  9. Given that so much of this was done through violence and exploitation, it’s probably reasonable that some people would seek to restore traditions and folkways from a more innocent time.

The Cultural Territories of Race

Acknowledgments Introduction: Moving Beyond Taking Cultural Illusions Seriously First and foremost, MICHELE LAMONT discusses how to cope with racism. Elijah Andersson discusses the social situation of the black executive, namely how black and white identities are seen in the corporate world. “Rags to Riches” Young Black Men’s Lives: Navigating Race and Getting Ahead in the “Rags to Riches” World LEE A. YOUNG JR., ALFORD A. YOUNG JR. Explaining the Comfort Factor: West Indian Immigrants Confront Race Relations in the United States of America MARY C.

  • Children’s Caregivers’ Perceptions of Contemporary American Society JULIA WRIGLEY is a writer who lives in New York City.
  • White and black workers’ perceptions of their own worth and status MICHELE LAMONT is a model and actress.
  • NEWMAN and CATHERINE ELLIS are two of the most prominent women in the world.
  • Education and the Politics of Race is the third section.
  • Racism is redefined by literature professors as a shifting moral boundary marked by multiculturalism.
  • PAMELA BARNHOUSE WALTERS is a group of women who work in the barnhouse industry.
  • MANSBRIDGE is a writer and editor based in New York City.
  • Dawson JENNIFER L.
  • Conclusion: What is the future of racial classification?

Multicultural Implications of Restorative Justice: Potential Pitfalls and Dangers

This file is provided for reference purposes only. It was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Please select access current information.

IV. Potential Cross-Cultural Pitfalls and DangersThe key to progress toward adaptation of restorativejustice frameworks is increased sensitivity to cross-cultural issues anddynamics that affect restorative justice programs and the administrationof justice itself. Often the cultural backgrounds of victim, offender,and program staff member are different, and these differences can leadto miscommunication, misunderstandings, or, worse, revictimization ofthe victim. This document’s opening scenario demonstrates a briefexchange between people of different cultural backgrounds that left eachparticipant feeling misunderstood, dissatisfied, and doubtful of the mediation’sefforts to “humanize” the justice system. A great danger when speaking of cross-cultural aspectsis overgeneralization. There are as many differences within cultures asbetween cultures. For example, significant customs, communication styles,and world views distinguish the rural White from the urban White, theupper-class Black from the lower-class Black, the Mexican Latino fromthe Puerto Rican Latino, the reservation American Indian from the nonreservationAmerican Indian. Differences within cultures are discussed later in thissection, but first we consider variations across cultures. Differences between persons raised and living in unlikecultural settings are often reflected in communication styles, typicallyin the way points of view are communicated; consider the potential pitfallsin interpreting another’s nonverbal communication. The following sectiondraws considerably from research-based findings reported by D.W. Sue andD. Sue inCounseling the Culturally Different(1990). Differences in CommunicationStyles Proximity.Cultural experience may dictate howclose to each other people stand when they converse. Generally, LatinAmericans, Africans, Black Americans, Indonesians, Arabs, South Americans,and the French are more comfortable speaking with less distance betweenthem than White Americans. In mediation or conversation, the White staffperson is often seen backing away, possibly feeling confronted or attacked.The Latino victim will appear to be chasing the White American mediatoracross the room, believing the mediator to be aloof or thinking, “He believeshe’s too good for me.” Both participants are misreading cues based ontheir cultural experiences and taking actions that will only reinforcemisunderstandings. Another example of distance preference is the desireby many White Americans to keep a desk or table between themselves andthe people they are talking to. In contrast, some Eskimos prefer sittingside by side when talking of intimate matters to sitting across from eachother. Body movements.Body movements often speak louderthan words. Posture, smiling, eye contact, laughing, gestures, and manyother movements communicate. How these nonverbal signals are interpretedmay vary greatly from culture to culture. Asians may be puzzled and offendedby a White mediator who wants to express herself with facial grimacesand smiles. The White mediator may conclude that the Asian, who has beentaught to tightly control expressing his feelings, has no emotion. Thus,an individual raised to value control of emotions may not shed tears forhaving burgled a home but may be feeling remorse. How many times have mental health professionals interpretedfailure to make eye contact to mean avoidance of an issue, poor self-confidence,submissiveness, or guilt and shame? In many traditional American-Indiancultures it is disrespectful to look an elder in the eye. In the classroom,American-Indian students often fail to look at the professor when speaking;many prefer not to speak at all. Blacks make more frequent eye contactwhen speaking than when listening, which leads some practitioners to describetheir Black clients as resistant or disinterested. Whites, on the otherhand, tend to make eye contact more when listening than when speaking.It is not difficult to conclude that these variations in making eye contactmay contribute to misunderstandings during mediation. Paralanguage.Paralanguage or other vocal cues,such as hesitations, inflections, silences, volume or timbre of voice,and pace of speaking, also provide ample opportunities for misinterpretationacross cultures. Rural Americans tend to talk at a slower pace than theirurban counterparts. Put a Northern Minnesota farmer in the same room witha New York City taxicab driver and they may have difficulty having a conversation,not because they do not share common interests or are not curious abouteach other but because they do not have the patience to work at communicating.The New Yorker could feel that an eternity had gone by before the Minnesotanhad completed a thought. The latter would have difficulty listening tothe fast-paced patter of the former. In American-Indian culture, silence is valued as sacred.Each person must have the opportunity to reflect, to translate thoughtsinto words, and to shape the words not only before taking a turn at speaking,but while speaking. White Americans often feel uncomfortable with silence.The French might regard silence as a sign of agreement. To an Asian, silencemay be considered a token of respect or politeness. Related somewhat to pace and silence is hesitation. Forpersons who speak rapidly and feel uncomfortable with silence, hesitationon the part of another is a cue to begin speaking. To the one who hesitates,such an action might be taken not as an interruption but as an intentional,grievous insult. Asians are given to speaking softly; many find U.S. speakersto be brash and loud. Arabs, on the other hand, may find U.S. speakersto be soft-spoken. The Arab prefers a higher volume. Persons of Asian descent may find U.S. Americans to betoo direct, blunt, and frank. The former will go to great lengths notto hurt feelings; the latter is often unaware when feelings have beenhurt. Density of language.Density of language alsodiffers among speakers from different cultural backgrounds. Blacks tendto be sparse and concise. Often, in exchanges among Blacks, many sharedcodes are used, requiring little further information. Even the simplephrase “uh, huh” is loaded with meaning when taken in the context of thesocial situation. To outsiders, Blacks may appear terse or disinterested.Asians and American Indians will often use many more words to say thesame thing as their White colleagues. The poetry of the story may be moreimportant than the content (and may actually be the point of the story).Much patience is required of Blacks and Whites to understand what is beingsaid when conversing with American Indians or Asians. One can readilysee potential communication problems that might arise in mediations involvingmembers of different cultural groups. Looking at these communication styles through a somewhatdifferent lens, Sue and Sue (1990) regard American-Indian, Asian-American,and Hispanic manners of expression to be understated and indirect; themanner of Whites is considered objective and task-oriented; Blacks’ mannersare regarded as affective, emotional, and interpersonal. Blacks will interruptor take a turn at speaking when they can. Whites will nod to indicatelistening or agreement. American Indians and Asians seldom provide cuesto encourage the speaker; they listen without significant nonverbal engagement.DifferencesAmong Cultures In addition to the potential pitfalls based on differentcommunication styles, other factors based on cultural differences casta shadow over attempts to build restorative justice programs. For example,the dominant U.S. White culture may emphasize individualism, competition,taking action, rational linear thinking, and “Christian principles anda Protestant work ethic,” but these are not values shared by all Whites,let alone persons of other cultures. Asians, Hispanics, and American Indiansare likely to place more emphasis on the community fabric and kinshipnetworks than on the place of the individual. American Indians furthercherish the place of the individual within the context of the entire naturalworld, without which the individual has no value. Persons from religious perspectives other than Christianity,which emphasizes “individual salvation,” may see the individual as equalto all living things, as on a journey toward individual fulfillment, oreven as insignificant in the total scheme of existence. This is not to suggest that any one world view is thecorrect one. It is simply noting that differing world views often clash(too often literally in the case of wars) and may threaten to undermineattempts at repairing wrongs caused by crime. Perhaps, broader than the scope of this work, it mightbe worthwhile to consider how the concept of justice varies across cultures.In traditional American-Indian culture, not only is the personal relation-shipdamaged by criminal behavior but also the communal or tribal relationship,and likely even the relationship of the individual to the universe, isdamaged, for violations within the tribal context may be regarded as aripping of the fabric that holds everything together. How can restorationof justice be promoted without knowing how the various participants withina given conflict understand and value justice? DifferencesWithin Cultures As noted above, significant dangers involved in discussingcross-cultural differences are overgeneralizing cultural differences andoverlooking intracultural differences. It is important to recognize thatsubcultures exist within larger cultures. Some cultural characteristicsmay be shared by most Whites, yet Whites raised in poor, rural Appalachiamay have different values, mannerisms, and communication patterns thanWhites raised in San Francisco. Likewise, middle- and upper-class Blacksof Los Angeles will share certain characteristics with Blacks raised inthe blighted areas of south Los Angeles, yet will vary considerably invalues, mannerisms, and communication patterns. The same can be said ofAsians raised in dense inner-city conclaves versus those who move to smalltownAmerica, or of Utes raised on a reservation far from the urban world comparedwith Utes raised in the fast pace of a metropolis. Race, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, religion,sexual orientation, rural or urban residence, and many other definingcharacteristics shape how an individual views the world and his or herplace in that world. These factors influence whether there is a propensityto blame the offender, the victim, or the community for crime and whetherparticipants come to a “justice program” seeking revenge or repair, desiringto act or to be acted upon, or expecting hope or defeat. Opportunities for restorative justice can only be enhancedwhen those who work in justice programs make the time and expend the energyto understand cultural differences and related communication problems.Racismas a Subset of Cultural Conflict While race and culture are intertwined, they are notone and the same. As indicated above, speech patterns, intensity of communication,interpretation of nonverbal cues, and many other nuances of interactionare influenced by the mix of race and culture. Although it would be amistake, for example, to assume that Blacks from different social classesand different regions of the culture communicate and handle conflict inthe same ways, the fact of being Black is likely a—if not the—keydetermining factor in how they perceive the world and how others perceivethem. The extent to which Blacks are aware of being overtlyor covertly subjected to prejudice and discrimination because of the colorof their skin influences their communication and efforts at conflict resolutionwith persons of other races. Previous experiences of individual or institutionalracism affect the role Blacks play in any interaction: whether they areopen or on guard, passive or aggressive. The impact of racism is a potential contextual variablein restorative justice programs in which participants are of differentraces. Where there is an imbalance of political power associated withrace, one may expect to find resources for schools, recreation, police,and so on to be weighted in favor of the group with the most politicalclout. In the United States, this often means that Whites have more resources,since representatives of their racial group are most often in positionsof political power. It would be erroneous, however, to assume that thereare not also consequences of racism felt in localities where, for example,Blacks have more political power than Hispanics, or Hispanics have morepolitical power than American Indians, or Asians have more political powerthan Whites. Racism is not the prerogative of persons of only one skincolor. Staff, paid or volunteer, need to analyze closely theirown behaviors to determine to what extent racism may be subtly apparentin their nonverbal behaviors or assumptions about the worlds of the victimand the offender. For example, do nonverbal actions such as folding one’sarms, scooting a chair backward, or shuffling papers indicate discomfortand a desire to be somewhere else? Each of these behaviors may simplybe an acceptable part of communication or they may be suggestive of prejudice.Do we assume that the American-Indian youth offender sitting before uscomes from a broken family of alcoholics, is lazy, and has no goals? Thesedescriptors may, in fact, describe a particular youth. But when they areassumed because of the youth’s skin color, they represent a racist attitude.Actions taken based on those assumptions, such as withholding educationalservices because the youth is believed to be lazy or failing to acknowledgethe strengths of the existing family structure because “it’s not normal,”are signs of racial discrimination. Program staff must not only examine their own beliefsand actions, but also be alert to the embedded racial biases of offendersand victims. Racism may be a justification used by the offender for committingthe crime. Racism may influence why the victim wants not an “ounce offlesh” but a “pound of flesh.” When racist assumptions or accusationsare likely to occur between offender and victim, the mediator must actas an interpreter or a buffer during premeetings and during any face-to-faceencounters, be they as part of mediation, community boards, or other restorativejustice programs. Although race cannot be equated with culture, it canbe such a powerful determining factor of communication and interactionpatterns that it should not be ignored when sorting out cultural differences.

Multicultural Implicationsof Restorative Justice:Potential Pitfalls and Dangers April 2000

Is There

I just finished reading this opinion post titled “There is no such thing as a ‘White Culture,'” and I couldn’t agree with it more. He bases his arguments on stereotypes – the idea that *all* people in a group act in accordance with the pattern that has been observed – as well as the idea that certain patterns of culture are exclusive – that is, if we observe one pattern of behavior in one group of people, we cannot expect to see that pattern in other groups of people. Norms, ideas, values, expectations, and behaviors are all taught to us by the groups of people to whom we belong, and they are referred to as “culture.” It is important to remember that observed cultural trends are tendencies of a community, not absolutes.

  • However, we humans have a natural tendency to associate with others who look like us because they feel “familiar.” So we may notice patterns of norms, beliefs, and actions – i.e.
  • Aside from that, any scientist is well aware that outliers do not invalidate trends.
  • To begin with, the notion that defining “hard work” as a feature of White culture implies that it cannot be a feature of other cultures – or, even more harmfully, infers that other cultures don’t work hard – implies that these cultural patterns are mutually exclusive, which is not the case.
  • In addition, we are aware that the same is true of Indian culture as well.
  • None of these civilizations has a monopoly on the concept of “we” as a cultural construct.
  • Without a doubt, Americans of diverse origins have made significant contributions to the culture of the United States.

Improved awareness of not just where these cultures are similar but also where they are different will allow us to better understand one another in the long run. Susan McCuistion is the owner of daiOne, LLC.

Category:White American culture – Wikipedia

It is the culture of White Americans in the United States that is referred to as White American culture. According to the United States Census Bureau, White people are defined as individuals “whose ancestors came from any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.”


This category contains the following 4 subcategories, for a total of 4 subcategories.

  • White American culture by city (4 C)
  • White American culture by state (20 C)
  • White American culture by ethnicity (4 C)


  • White American groups (1 C, 5 P)
  • Works about White Americans (1 C, 41 P)
  • Works about White Americans (1 C, 5 P).

Pages in category “White American culture”

This category contains the following 12 pages, out of a total of 12 pages. It is possible that this list might not reflect current changes (learn more).


  • National Association of Black and White Men Together
  • National Association of Black and White Men Together


  • White ethnic
  • White nigger
  • White Privilege Conference
  • White ethnicity

“oldid=913007302” was retrieved from the database.

Racism, Culture, Markets

SAVE £7.001 on the first edition 1994 was the year of the copyright.

Racism, Culture, Markets

Racism, Culture, and Markets investigates the linkages that exist between cultural representations of ‘race’ and their historical, institutional, and global forms of expression and influence, as well as the economic consequences of these representations. John Gabriel investigates the contemporary obsession with market place philosophies in the context of the crisis in anti-racist movements and the growing concern over concerns of cultural identity in his book Market Place Philosophies. Issues such as the continued relevance of terms such as “black” as a basis for self definition, the need to think about identities in more fluid and complex ways, and the need to develop a much more explicit discussion of the construction of whiteness and white identities are all discussed in detail.

Along with the role played by modern media and popular culture in these disputes, his case studies look at the role played by the media in general and the role played by print and electronic media in particular.

White People Are Noticing Something New: Their Own Whiteness (Published 2018)

The experience of being white in America has long been regarded as being too familiar to be of any interest, at least among white people. For decades, it has been the default identity, the cultural wallpaper — something that is defined, when at all, using trite metaphors like milk and vanilla and codes like “cornfed” and “all-American” to express itself. Grass is green, the sky is blue, and, until very recently, a product characterized as “nude” or “flesh-colored” was most likely to resemble the skin of Caucasian or Asian individuals.

It doesn’t happen very frequently!

We prefer to think about identity in terms of ethnicity rather than nationality: Identifying as Italian, Irish, or Jewish appears to be accompanied by a sense of excitement, sadness, and the opportunity to take pleasure in some common past.

After Trump galvanized his nearly completely white base with demands for banning Muslims and deporting “bad hombres” in the months leading up to the 2016 election, Politico posed the question “What’s Going On With America’s White People?” It was with an episode titled “Can We Talk About Whiteness?” that the NPR podcast “Code Switch” made its debut.

  • Dear White Folks was taken up by Netflix, and “Get Out,” which turned self-proclaimed Obama-supporting white people into figures of horror, was the most talked-about blockbuster of 2017.
  • People of color, who have spent generations intensely aware of how the power of whiteness functions, continue to provide much of the harshest scrutiny, as they have done for ages.
  • An arrest was made after two black customers at a Philadelphia Starbucks did not order immediately after one of them asked to use the restroom.
  • Eventually, BBQBecky’s picture became a meme, appearing on “Saturday Night Live” and being put into stills from films such as “Black Panther,” Barack Obama’s inauguration, and a black Last Supper, among other things.
  • Instead, they were depicted as an unique subculture with odd and frightening customs, which they were not.
  • For a long time, many white people believed that it was our right, as the majority, to interact with individuals of different races and wonder at the unique foods, structures, and clothing they wore.
  • Our frequently-claimed colorblindness and fondness for individualism are among our most remarked-on behaviors, as is our purported indifference to race, which often reads more like ignorance of it.
  • When confronted with racial conflict, we may react with outrage and defensiveness, which is referred to as “white fragility.” White people are losing the luxury of being unaware of their own existence, which is an extremely difficult transition that we are not always adapting to.

“Now it’s the white folks who appear to be in a bind.” Unsurprisingly, the earliest applications of the word “white” in American law were in the context of slavery — specifically, exempting white indentured servants from the limitations that forbade African slaves from owning property or weapons, as well as learning to read and write, among other things.

A foreigner who was a “free white person” may become a citizen under the country’s first Naturalization Act, which was passed in 1790 and laid the groundwork for the 1882 law that prohibited laborers from China from becoming citizens (later expanded to encompass other parts of Asia).

The “common conception” of whiteness remained leaky and inconsistent, but those who were included within it typically saw it as a noble vocation — the “white man’s burden,” a mission to civilize the world’s others, or even as a matter of divine right.

However, as long as white people continue to consider themselves as the norm and the neutral, we will not have replaced as much as we might expect.

The dark heart of whiteness has been described by people of color throughout history — as the poet and lawyer James Weldon Johnson observed more than a century ago, “the colored people of this country know and understand the white people better than the colored people of this country know and understand themselves.” Mr.

James Baldwin said in his remarkable book “The Fire Next Time,” published in 1963, that white people could only find a solution to their predicament by searching inside themselves.

The Parkland student activists, for example, have appeared to be almost intuitively knowledgeable about such matters, finding ways to interweave their goals and share the stage with kids of color who, as one put it, “had always stared down the barrel of a gun.” “It’s almost like they knew what they were doing,” said one.

It is often the case that the switch that Painter described turns from nothingness to awfulness when white Americans immerse themselves in their group identification.

Currently, a majority of white Americans think that their own race is being discriminated against in some way.

White resentment and torch-lit white-power marches are common topics in the news these days. White Americans who “appear lost” are looking for something important: a way to see ourselves without turning into something abominable in the process of doing so.

White Supremacy Culture Resources

The National Education Association has a vision for every student. We are well aware that racism, both institutional and systemic, stands in the way of realizing our objective. In order to eradicate systematic patterns of racial unfairness and injustice that affect our Association, schools, students, and education communities, we shall mobilize the collective strength and collective voice of our members and other stakeholders. Racism based on the notion that white people are superior to persons of other racial backgrounds and that whites should exercise political, economic, and social dominance over non-whites is known as White Supremacy Culture (WSC).

White Supremacy Culture- a form of racism centered upon the belief that white people are superior to people of other racial backgrounds and that whites should politically, economically, and socially dominate non-whites.

Features of white supremacy that exhibit themselves in corporate culture and are adopted as norms and standards without being consciously selected or identified by the entire group. They are harmful to people of color and white people alike because they elevate the values, tastes, and experiences of one racial group over all others, which is harmful to both groups. The hallmarks of White Supremacy Culture may be seen in organizations that are headed by people of color or have a majority of people of color on their board of directors.

In this society, white privilege can persist without white people being aware of its existence, and it contributes to the preservation of the country’s racial hierarchical structure.

These maneuvers include the outward presentation of emotions such as wrath, fear, and guilt, as well as actions such as debate, silence, and fleeing the stressful circumstance in which one is placed.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *