- 1 The dark side of stan culture
- 2 ‘Stan’ culture needs to stop –u00a0or at least radically change. Here’s why.
- 3 Is there a psychological component?
- 4 The negatives of ‘stan’ culture
- 5 What Makes K-pop Stans & Stan Culture So Powerful?
- 6 Stan Groups Employ Familiar, Digitally-Fueled Tactics to Wield Power
- 7 Stan culture is unhealthy for celebrities and fans
- 8 OPINION: Stan culture is a new way to obsess
- 9 The origin of stan culture — The Finery Report
- 10 What’s The Deal With Stan Culture?
- 11 The Dangers of Stan Culture
The dark side of stan culture
The invention of the internet, as well as the proliferation of online platforms and social media, has made it increasingly simple for anyone to build a digital following. With hours of content and readily available information about digital celebrities and content creators available on the internet, it’s no surprise that people have grown increasingly attached to them, resulting in the rise of the internet phenomenon known as “stan culture,” which means “fan culture.” Although the notion of “stans” is not new, the name was first created by Eminem all the way back in 2000 as a combination of “stalker” and “fan,” according to a Wikipedia entry.
Affectionate admirers of celebrities and performers were originally associated with the term, but it has lately been reinterpreted in several online forums to describe someone who is a little more invested than the ordinary follower of a particular celebrity or entertainer.
People who are simply followers of a content creator are referred to as stans, which isn’t always a fair designation, and’stan culture’ is actually a harmful phenomenon.” So, what precisely is it about stan culture that makes it so dangerous?
Parasocial connections are formed when fans get unduly connected to the content producers they follow, even going so far as to consider them as friends despite never having met them in person.
- In less severe cases, these relationships can actually have a positive impact on those who are content to be with them.
- According to Valsote, this reliance may become problematic since the picture that producers paint of themselves is frequently false, particularly when it comes to their demeanor away from the camera, according to Valsote.
- In addition, Valsote believes the quarantine circumstances contributed to this problem, since many partnerships with content providers filled the hole left by a lack of in-person engagement during the quarantine period.
- In many cases, these types of interactions result in a sense of entitlement among fans, which may result in an extreme reaction against a creator when personal information or content is not provided to them.
- ” “I’ve also had individuals approach me for information on the people I’ve showed on my platform, such as friends or family members,” I said.
- In addition to creating video about Stanford and other colleges, Makenna Turner ’24 maintains a YouTube channel, Keeping Up with Ken, that has received more than 30,000 followers and two million views.
“Even as a small content creator, I’ve had instances where people have messaged my friends, because they noticed we followed each other, asking for my personal contact information, to the point where sometimes I don’t even tag my friends in my Instagram posts because I’m afraid they’ll be harassed,” Turner said.
- In addition to a sense of entitlement, fans may also experience a sense of ownership over a creative and the content that she or he produces.
- For example, when YouTuber Bobby Burns shifted from uploading videos to vlogging instead, he received an avalanche of negative feedback from viewers who felt they were compelled to watch a specific sort of material from him.
- Social compensation can result in violence, media addiction and reliance, discontent with one’s life, and concerns with one’s self-esteem and confidence.
- The failure to meet these overly high expectations for content providers can have severe consequences for both the creator and the audience.
- In response to the emergence of cancel culture, the internet is ready to highlight the wrongdoings of content producers, whether it’s a Tweet from ten years ago or a video clip that has been pulled completely out of context.
- When it comes to cancel culture, parasocial ties have only aggravated it further, leading to greater demands for producers and harsher sanctions when they ultimately fail to satisfy those expectations.
- This complaint raises the question of whether or not content makers are accountable for the conduct of their following.
He has a significant following, which is primarily comprised of young adolescents, many of whom have created parasocial ties with him as a result of their interactions with him.
Furthermore, Dream deliberately fosters stan culture and refuses to set strong boundaries for his supporters, resulting in an engaged fandom that has hounded him and shared uncomfortable things about him on social media.
According to Turner, when you’re a creator and you have an audience, no matter how huge or tiny, you have influence – people perceive you as a figure in their lives and look to you for guidance.
Moreover, many inventors take advantage of the individuals who look up to them on a regular basis.
If you have fans who are engaging against you and stalking you, however, it is the fans’ responsibility for being creepy, Turner continued.
Taking accountability of activities that degrade a creator’s privacy is important, according to the authors.
We may, on the other hand, encourage content producers whose fanbases are particularly toxic to create more stringent limits against creating harmful connections with other creators in the future.
To paraphrase the words of Turner, “It’s fine to acknowledge that you appreciate what someone does and the influence they have on your life, but it’s not appropriate to take it to an extreme where you obsess over them and the personality that they project online.”
‘Stan’ culture needs to stop –u00a0or at least radically change. Here’s why.
Swifties. Barbs. Army. Lambs. The names of these groups match to celebrity fandoms. Swifties are able to survive on anything. Taylor Swift is a singer-songwriter from the United States. Barbs are known for saying “bottoms up” to everything. Nicki Minaj is a rapper from the United States. For BTS, the army goes full-on militant, and the Lambs are led byMariah Carey. Members of these organizations are sometimes referred to as “stans,” which refers to die-hard followers who will go to any level to demonstrate their loyalty to the celebrity of their choice.
According to Shana Redmond, a professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University, “It is important not to hold celebrities to impossible standards because they are fallible humans with inevitable flaws and shortcomings, just like the rest of us.” Celebrities, she explains, “are fallible humans with inevitable flaws and shortcomings, just like the rest of us.” “What we see on social media is only a little slice of who they are – we can’t replace that gloss for the full person,” says the author.
- In the case of BTS: “Smooth as chocolate “Butter”: BTS, Megan Thee Stallion turn up the heat on the remix, and the fans are “not OK.” The name “Stan” is derived from an Eminem song of the same name, which tells the story of a violent super-fan of the rapper.
- Kadia Pow, a lecturer in sociology and Black studies at Birmingham City University in England, thinks that today’s use of the term “stan” is “somewhat less ominous” than the term’s (original) connotation.
- Look no farther than the classic photos of ladies shouting and sobbing over The Beatles on “The Ed Sullivan Show” for examples of more recent history.
- Celebrities and fellow aficionados are now more easily available.
According to Redmond, when a celebrity can be reached almost at any time of day or on any day of the year, “‘Stan culture’ takes on a certain intensity.” Fans may mobilize in a short period of time to help an artist’s music ascend the charts — think of Mariah Carey’s “All I Want for Christmas is You” song.
Alternatively, they may pursue anybody who they believe has insulted their beloved celebrity (see:Lady Gaga fans and Ed Sheeran). Hmm: A star is born’ director Bradley Cooper, who stars in Lady Gaga’s ‘A Star Is Born,’ had the ‘wrong notion,’ according to Barbra Streisand.
Is there a psychological component?
The answer is yes – however it is limited to the concept of “celebrity worship.” Dr. Randy A. Sansone and Dr. Lori A. Sansone’s research, published in 2014 in ” Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience,” discovered that so-called “celebrity worshippers” may “have concerns about body image (particularly in young adolescents),” be “more prone to cosmetic surgery,” and may exhibit “narcissistic features, dissociation, addictive tendencies, stalking behavior, and compulsive purchasing.” It has been shown that those who have a high level of celebrity adoration are more prone to have problems with their mental well-being.
According to Gayle Stever, there are three forms of celebrity worship:
- Everyday fans are interested in entertainment and social activities. “The items on their scale that show this form of celebrity worship are ‘talking with my friends about my favorite celebrity is a nice time,'” Stever explains
- “talking with my friends about my favorite celebrity is a good time,'” he adds. Stever includes expressions that are intense and intimate, such as, “The following statements are said about a favorite celebrity:’my favorite celebrity is my soul mate’ and ‘if my favorite celebrity died, I would not want to live’. This is when the phenomenon of celebrity worship gets problematic.”
- An individual who is borderline pathological is defined as someone who “believes that if their favorite celebrity requested that they do anything unlawful, they would do it,” according to Stever.
Stewart, a professor of social and behavioral sciences at SUNY Empire State College, believes that most people who engage in borderline pathological celebrity worship were already suffering from some sort of mental illness before they became so involved in celebrity worship. “From my own observations, most people who engage in borderline pathological celebrity worship were probably already suffering from some sort of mental illness before they became so involved in celebrity worship,” he says.
“The attraction to familiar faces and sounds is something that we as human beings are ‘hardwired’ to do from birth.
“According to one hypothesis, attachment develops in a manner similar to the connection that one may develop to any known individual, such as a friend or family member.” As a result, some amount of celebrity adoration is unavoidable.
In case you missed it, it’s time to call an end to the ‘cancel culture’ movement.
The negatives of ‘stan’ culture
- Because humans are fallible, the Stan culture is faulty as well. How can you expect someone who is exceptional in one thing, such as singing, to be equally exceptional at everything else? “I have a great deal of respect and admiration for my urologist since he was able to remove kidney stones from my body,” Thompson adds. “I don’t believe my urologist is fully free and flawless in every other sense, either,” I say further. The term “stan” implies steadfast support
- Yet, this does not imply that such attachment is indestructible. According to David Schmid, associate professor of English at the University of Buffalo, “If the object of admiration does something wrong, that repetition may very rapidly transition to hate.” Some R. Kelly and Michael Jackson supporters, for example, remained by their idols when charges of sexual assault were made against them. Other fans, on the other hand, were devastated. Such disappointments are not out of the ordinary. “It’s normal to feel disappointed when (numbers) turn out to be something other than what you expected,” Redmond explains. The fact that we’re continually flooded with fresh material designed to captivate us and make us fall in love with someone means that it may happen frequently. As a result of their desire to avoid biting the hand that feeds them, some superstars, according to Schmid, do not engage more directly with their followers. We’ve always had high expectations of celebrities, expecting them to be very different from us while simultaneously being relatable — a perplexing dichotomy. “It is impossible for a superstar to meet both of those needs at the same time,” Schmid asserts. Even still, superstars might do more to keep their supporters under control. Anyone who speaks critically about Taylor Swift, for example, may expect to be roasted by her Swifties. “Frequently, we discuss the influence that stans have on the game. Nonetheless, we don’t talk about the influence that superstars have over their adoring fans nearly enough “Schmid expresses himself. “And I believe that this has to be brought to the forefront in the future. ” According to Pow, such “dragging” might be “destructive.” As Pow points out, “in order to retain the image untarnished, they must go after individuals who harm the image.” Furthermore, not every “stan” culture is inherently detrimental. In the words of Pow, who made a Tumblr page in appreciation of the Shonda Rhimes television series ” Scandal,” “It allows us to shamelessly appreciate art, culture, and other creative outputs that we adore.” Stanning also contributes to the appreciation of entertainment on social media: “What would many of these platforms be like if we didn’t have to talk about the things we like (and don’t like) all of the time? As a result, stanning might provide significance to our life that we do not receive from the responsibilities we must do.” Schmid believes that stan culture should not be stigmatized, but rather should be harnessed as a force for good. Consider how many individuals Ariana Grande and Taylor Swift have motivated to become involved in politics, for example. Furthermore, it is absurd to believe that stans will ever stop staning. ‘A large part of the enjoyment comes from a sense of purity in the fixation and the purity of the extreme,’ says Schmid of the extreme. Aww: Ariana Grande and her husband Dalton Gomez are enjoying a romantic getaway: Take a look at the images.
What Makes K-pop Stans & Stan Culture So Powerful?
What exactly does it mean to be a “stan” mean to you? Despite the fact that the term “stan” has been around since 2000 (see: Eminem’s song “Stan”), folks who identify as stans have been increasingly visible in the last few of years. For example, the month of June 2020 was a tremendous show of force for K-pop stans, as well as an introduction to many people in the United States as to what a “stan” truly is. A succinct definition is as follows: Stan is a combination of the words stalker and fan; it refers to a fan who is extremely attached to a celebrity and who often exhibits characteristics of a parasocial connection with that star.
- Specifically, in the case of stans, their commitment to a particular person, organization, or ideology that brings them together and motivates them to act can, and frequently does, result in massive collateral harm to individuals, organizations, and enterprises.
- First, let’s take a look back at a three-week period of K-pop stan impact in 2020 that propelled stan culture to the forefront of the global political and cultural zeitgeist, ultimately leading to the development of what we know as today’s stan culture.
- Fancams (close-up videos taken by audience members during a live performance of their favorite K-pop group) flooded the app, allowing them to achieve two goals at once: they demonstrated their dissatisfaction with authorities while also celebrating their love for the group.
- The aim was to generate enough noise to drown out any racist messages, which was accomplished with comments such as: “Ignore whatever the f**k this is.
- The Kpop fans used social media platforms like as Twitter and TikTok to spread the message, encouraging hundreds of thousands of people to register for the free rally tickets, fail to show up, and erase their tweets within 24-48 hours.
The next day, some remarks looked to be from teens who were excited about the potential to have an impact on the election despite their ineligibility to vote at the time.
Stan Groups Employ Familiar, Digitally-Fueled Tactics to Wield Power
The basic components of the power that the K-pop stan group (which has since been followed by other stan communities) is wielding are straightforward: social media platform usage + a common passion and/or ideology + hyperactive involvement and desire to act are the main factors. These are the basic characteristics for the majority of “factions,” which are groups of highly involved and ideologically linked individuals that are dedicated to propagating their respective viewpoints and ideas. From K-pop stans to 2nd Amendment Rights Activists, Hipster Mamma Lifestyle Bloggers, and Fringe Trolls, we see a wide range of groups in our work that represent a broad range of interests and political perspectives.
Additional definitions: In addition to the ones listed above, the following definitions are useful when discussing stans:
- Online stanning is defined as the act of expressing one’s ardent support for a beloved celebrity. Individuals who are campaigning for the same celebrity will frequently coordinate their efforts with and promote the actions of other campaigners. Stan culture is comprised of a common lingua franca (including terms like OOMF, shade, tea, wig, sis, skinny, skinny legend, bop, fat, flop, locals, normies, etc.). This vernacular frequently intersects (or appropriates) with (or borrows from) African-American online culture and LGBTQ online culture, among other things. In reality, a significant component of stan culture is the support of homosexual males for (often stereotypically hyper-feminine) female musicians such as Ariana Grande, Lady Gaga, and Beyoncé (and, prior to the internet, Judy Garland and Madonna).
Stan culture is a term used to describe an online phenomenon in which communities of stalker fans, or stans, express overly enthusiastic support for a favorite celebrity online (a practice known as “stanning”), which may include vehement, coordinated attacks against detractors and critics of the celebrity. In order to support their favorite artists, some have accused Stan culture of being fundamentally unhealthy, prompting significant celebrities (often women) to shut down their social media accounts, and committing fraud in order to elevate their social position.
Stan Factions Employ a Variety of Tactics Brigading (also known as an attack): Stans frequently engage in brigading in order to target the critics of their favorite artists.
They have also called for “muting” public figures who have taken the side of Jackson’s accusers (such as Oprah Winfrey) and boycotting businesses that have refused to play his music in their establishments because of the allegations.
The majority of corporations are aware of the possible, if slight, ramifications of siding with the perceived majority of the population.
Stan culture is unhealthy for celebrities and fans
Many cultural trends have emerged as a result of social media, but one of the most hazardous of them is “stan” culture. It has been suggested that the term “stan” is a combination of the terms “fan” and “stalker.” However, some claim that the term was inspired by a line from Eminem’s blockbuster song, “Stan,” which relates the narrative of a fan gone insane. In any case, the phrase “stan” does not have a favorable connotation in its origin. “Stanning” has taken over social media networks, particularly Twitter, where fans can keep up with their favorite celebrities on a regular basis.
- Stalking and bullying are glorified and encouraged in the stan culture.
- Celebrities have virtually little privacy, especially in this day and age of social media, which makes sense.
- Stans have stepped over dangerous lines by showing up at the homes of celebrities, sending improper fan mail, and posting threatening statements on social media platforms.
- The man who broke into Selena Gomez’s house was apprehended and subsequently came up to Gomez’s house again hours later, in a more serious stalking episode.
- Taylor Swift was the target of a stalker who spoke with her father and threatened to murder her and her family as a whole.
- Swift’s stalker had written her countless strange messages online before her arrest, including this one: “Without her, I wander the planet alone forever, and she’ll continue to endure unsuccessful relationships that crush her heart.” Swift’s stalker was charged with stalking.
- Because of some unknown reason, it appears that stans have a sense of ownership over their chosen celebrity, which is troubling.
Christina Grimmie, a singer and YouTuber who featured on NBC’s “The Voice,” was assassinated by a frenzied fan after a concert in 2016 during a meet-and-greet afterward.
They’ve developed their own online communities in which they talk about the object of their adoration and criticize other celebrities and their fan groups in the process.
The “Swifties,” in my opinion, are the most aggressive standom, because they aggressively attack everyone who has an unfavorable opinion about Taylor Swift.
This conduct is inappropriate and poisonous, and it demonstrates how standoms behave as if they are at war with anybody who does not agree with their point of view.
Nicki Minaj stans assaulted freelance writer Wanna Thompson for stating that Nicki Minaj should make more adult songs, which the writer denied.
When the Barbz were involved, chaos erupted; they ordered Thompson to commit suicide, ridiculed her 4-year-old daughter, and sent insulting messages to her personal mobile phone, email address, and other social media profiles.
Shaheed, a self-proclaimed Barbz member, spoke to Rolling Stone about his experiences with the group.
It is upsetting to refer to a celebrity as your child and to act in a mother position with them, as you have done.
Celebrities occupy far too much of the time of fans, and this can’t possibly be beneficial to their own personal life.
Stans become absorbed in their fascinations and lose sight of the need of being tolerant to other humans.
They must emphasize the significance of tolerance to their audiences and confront the poison that exists among their fan groups.
Hopefully, it will not take any more extreme stalking episodes or unwarranted violence for standoms to revert to their former state of healthy fandoms. Miranda Thomas’s illustration is shown on this page.
OPINION: Stan culture is a new way to obsess
The dream to be near to your favorite artist or superstar is a hunger that sits in the hearts of millions throughout the world as they fight to somehow capture a glance, a moment or a snapshot to recall the day they met the individual(s) who altered their life for the better. While that objective may appear to be nearly unattainable, during the past several years, achieving that goal has grown a whole lot more dangerously close to becoming attainable. stan culture is defined as something “notorious for extreme actions generally committed by a minority within the fanbase, such as threatening others, treating certain celebrities as if they’re demigods, sports riots, and basically just doing anything for attention,” according to the Merriam Webster’s dictionary.
In Eminem’s song “Stan,” which was published in 2000, he expresses the high amount of devotion that a stan has for their “hero.” This is something that is conveyed powerfully in the song.
As a result of his tremendous wrath, Stan ties up his fiancée and places her in the trunk of his car, which he then drives off a bridge on a dark and rainy evening.
In a similar vein, stan culture has remained mostly unchanged over the past few years, even as numerous stan communities have grown to become a significant component of Instagram profiles.
From creating aesthetically pleasing accounts, to 24/7 update accounts with multiple co-owners, accounts dedicated to previously unseen photographs of specific idols, and an overall fun platform for fans to engage on freely and openly, there’s no doubt that stan culture has served as an anchor to unite and introduce hundreds upon thousands of “The positivesthat people are really pleasant and kind to one another,” said DePaul junior Anja Bencun.
- “Even though I don’t have a stan Instagram account, I’ll follow other ones and sometimes we’ll communicate about BTS.
- Even if the support of stans inside their individual communities appears to be unfathomable to many, there have been occasions in which the devotion of these fans has accelerated to the point where the idols have been put in danger of serious damage.
- In one instance, a sasaeng member leaked the address of Jackson Wang, a rapper for the Korean band Got7 back in September.
- Similarly, on a more national scale we see that children and young adults often trespass on the properties of famous YouTubers, such as David Dobrik and Jake Paul.
- “Most negative interactions online then are annoying but harmless, where the person’s difference of opinion justout as random and irrelevant, rather than combative arguments or such,” said DePaul senior Ryan O’Connell.
Hopefully the X-Men’s mission of acceptance and intolerance has been digested by most stans, as I’ve found the community more welcoming of people with diverse identities and backgrounds as compared to other comic stan communities.” Negative experiences, however, aren’t necessarily confined to the stans of a specific celebrity.
“ In 2016 Fifth Harmony’s Normani Kordei quit Twitter briefly due to ongoing harassment and abuse… from Fifth Harmony stans,” wrote Mat Whitehead for the Huffington Post.
Due to Normani’s comment, “Harmonizers” in turn began to send her hurtful tweets on Twitter which resulted in her to issue a lengthy and detailed explanation of her feelings and her experiences dealing with unjust hate and disrespect.
Fandom has roots not only in love for The Thing but also in frustration with it, leading to things like Premiere League fans in the UK campaigning for affordable ticket prices or the creation of fan fiction, videos, songs, and art that re-imagines popular figures and works in really interesting and diverse ways,” said DePaul assistant professor Samantha Close.
“Stans do the things they do because of a key idea called ‘parasocial interaction,’” said Daniel Faltesek, a new media communications professor at the University of Oregon.
These relationships are one-sided and they are mediated.
Despite there being several incidents of appalling negativity and violation of privacy displayed by these extreme and overzealous fans, there’s no denying that stan culture has become that threshold for users all over the world to connect with deeply and to share their love with one another, as well as the world, over the people who have greatly impacted their life.
Somewhere amidst all the headlines of “obsessive fans” resides a platform of thousands of people showcasing a different type of energetic love that is able to completely change the course of the media.
The origin of stan culture — The Finery Report
Image courtesy of Shutterstock To be a ‘extremely or excessively enthusiastic and devoted fan’, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, one must first be “an extremely or excessively enthusiastic and devoted fan.” To be “an extremely devoted and enthusiastic fan of someone or something,” one must first “be an extremely devoted and enthusiastic fan of someone or something,” according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
- A song by rapper Eminem published in 2000 titled ‘Stan’ is said to be the inspiration for the term.
- Some believe that the term “stan” was coined by combining the phrases “stalker” and “fan,” and that the term quickly became associated with fandom culture from its earliest days.
- Nas, a hip hop musician who made a name for himself with the song ‘Ether,’ which was published in 2001, also made use of the phrase.
- Due to the fact that the term “stan” is usually used to describe fans who are believed to be obsessed, protective, aggressive, and just plain fanatical towards the people and/or things they like, the phrase has had and continues to have a negative connotation throughout history.
- The rise in the number of stans, as well as the advancement of technology, particularly social media, has resulted in the emergence of “stan culture.” Stans are more than simply a group of people who have a common interest in something; they are a well-organized movement.
- However, how does one go about becoming a stan?
- The sincere love she feels from BTS, according to another fan who goes by the initials ‘G,’ makes her a BTS supporter because she has never felt this kind of genuine love from any other artist towards their followers.
A fan of the popular television program Supernatural, going by the name Elmo, went to such lengths as traveling all the way from Indonesia to Europe for a convention where she met some of her favorite actors and participated in fan-driven events.
For example, in April 2019, the hashtags 7YearsWithEXO, 7ogetherWithEXO, and EXO7thAnniversary, which were created to commemorate EXO’s 7th anniversary, won three of the top seven positions on the worldwide popular tag list, according to Twitter.
K-Pop stans, for example, frequently construct ‘fancams,’ or short, edited video compilations of their idols, and publish them on social media, typically under tweets or posts that have absolutely nothing to do with their idols at all, in order to promote their favorites.
Recently, these events have grown to include charities and social concerns, encouraging individuals to give to and join charities, as well as to support a cause or cause-related organization.
In just 25 hours, the ‘ARMY,’ the fan base of the South Korean boy band BTS, was able to raise $1 million for the Black Lives Matter movement.
In this situation, stans get into an argument with stans of other artists who are either viewed as rivals or who have insulted them in some way, or who have been shown (or in some circumstances, only ‘believed’) to be generally troublesome.
The pejorative connotation associated with the name stan, while frequently criticized as harsh, was not without foundation.
Take, for example, fans of the HBO series Game of Thrones, who were dissatisfied with the way the show’s eighth season unfolded.
When defending their favorites, stans have been known to revert to being insensitive bullies, and their comments have escalated to the point of threatening murder.
The answers from the rapper’s followers were not based on musical or cultural observations, nor were they based on well-argued arguments.
Photographs of her four-year-old daughter were incorporated in several of the pieces.
Even the rapper herself got in on the act.
They harass her on social media for months, and she eventually decides to leave because of the racism and abuse she has received.
However, not all stans are of the same mentality when it comes to stan culture. “G” is repulsed by the concept of stans that are harmful to the human body. “I feel that it is OK to hate or disagree with something, but that toxicity and bullying are completely unneeded.” Previous
Asal muasal budaya ‘stan’
The CultureTFR Team Batch 8, Indonesia, and the Batch 8 – Indonesian are now on the job.
Peragaan busana harus berjalan, namun dengan presentasi yang lebih menarik
Business, fashion, and industry analysis are all topics covered. Allysha Nila Batch 8, Indonesia, Batch 8 – Indonesian, Allysha Nila Batch 8, Indonesia
What’s The Deal With Stan Culture?
Over the past decade, fans have formed online communities to rally behind their favorite artists, but these “safe spaces” may swiftly devolve into poisonous environments when the most ardent supporters go too far. Something wonderful happened in the early 2010s when musicians such as Ariana Grande, Nicki Minaj, Lady Gaga, and bands such as One Direction broke through at a time when social media was just being started. Fans were able to connect with other fans of the same musicians as a result of the increased accessibility and oversaturation of artists made possible by social media.
- However, it has the potential to become extremely poisonous very quickly.
- The most ardent admirers refer to themselves as “stans,” and stan culture has a nasty habit of sucking the life out of places that were intended to be enjoyable.
- Twitter and Instagram have provided us with unprecedented access to celebrities and other notable figures.
- People used Twitter to express their admiration and support for their favorite musicians, and it quickly became the go-to destination for them.
- Take nothing I say here as a criticism; internet fandoms and stan culture have done wonderful things for the artists they support.
- What exactly is a stan?
- Some assume the term “stan” derives from a mix of the words “stalker” and “fan,” but it really comes from an Eminem song of the same name from 2000 that originated in the United Kingdom.
Stan accuses Eminem of not responding to his fan letters, which he feels he is due by the rapper.
Someone who is willing to go to great measures to support their favorite musical performers.
The atmosphere is different, and they’ve made it obvious that there is no space for casual fans, or “locals,” as they prefer to refer to them.
These societies, which were mostly established by groups of adolescent girls (no offense intended to young girls), Their influence is actually boundless) that seem to be a safe and friendly environment may quickly become poisonous for everyone involved.
However, although some people are justifiably being called out for their conduct, occasionally popular topics on Twitter are formed because one fanbase is enraged by another.
It appears as though full-fledged conflicts would erupt over prizes and whose songs are performing better on the charts than which.
Fandoms of a single band, on the other hand, may have sub-fandoms (or multiple stan groups) for each member of the band.
All or nothing, and if they don’t agree with anything you have to say, you can always anticipate some harsh responses in exchange.
During my study, I’ve discovered that many “stan accounts” operate anonymously, frequently using fictitious names and displaying images.
People who utilize anonymous Twitter accounts have been doxed and outed, according to reports.
Stans can accomplish anything they set their minds to if they had access to high-speed internet and a MacBook Pro.
Aside from the fact that fandoms and stan culture completely violate the privacy of the individuals they profess to love and respect, they also promote a sense of entitlement among those who identify with them.
They hope that a fresh selfie or a never-before-seen snapshot from the past will alleviate their content shortage.
Furthermore, those who have been fans of the artist/band for a longer length of time tend to feel and act superior to those who are new to the band/artist.
Your fictional stan card will be taken away and you will be expelled from the club if you have missed out on events that others have had the good fortune to enjoy.
It also just scratches the surface of the desolate places that these nooks of the internet have become.
Anyone who claims to be a fan is, in fact, a fan.
It’s fair to say that there have always been diehards who are willing to go the extra mile.
Although I’m not sure they’ve ever been this defensively aggressive in the past. Lastly, if you find yourself in one of these specific corners of the internet (which I hope you never do), remember that we are all fans of the same person, and I cannot emphasize enough that none of it truly matters.
The Dangers of Stan Culture
A new set of words and phrases is added to the Merriam-Webster dictionary every few months, according to the company. Our ever-growing library of English vocabulary has grown by more than 640 new terms in only one month, in April 2019. These terms, which range from “buzzy” to “bioabsorbable,” are gently but steadily influencing the culture in which we currently live. There’s one of these terms that was added in April that’s really noteworthy. As a noun and a verb, it’s a distinctive term that more and more youngsters are coming to identify with — “stan.” It’s an expression that has become more popular among teenagers.
Excessive and extreme fandom go well beyond being a casual follower and into perilous terrain on the verge of becoming an obsession.
The Origins of Stan
Whether it’s obsessive devotion to the K-pop duo BTS, the HBO series “Game of Thrones,” or Justin Bieber, the vast majority of teenagers who identify as stans are likely ignorant of the term’s sinister origins. During the year 2000, the rapper Eminem released a menacing track titled “Stan,” which featured the singer Dido and peaked at the top of the charts in 12 different nations. The song is written from the perspective of Stan, an Eminem fan who is infatuated with the rapper and who sends fan letters to him that gradually spiral out of hand, finally prompting Stan to drive his car off a bridge in the middle of the song.
Despite the fact that it has been over two decades since Eminem popularized the phrase, the dangers of being a stan are still very much alive and well.
The Creation of a Stan
For example, remember “Beatlemania” in the 1960s? That’s not to say that the overall notion of being a stan is entirely new. For decades, adoring followers have been a given, but with the emergence of the Internet and the popularity of social media, a whole new level of access to celebrities has been opened up to the general public. The fact that social media platforms such as Instagram and Twitter allow fans to have access to the lives of so many actors and actresses as well as athletes and singers may give the idea that many of their young, naïve followers know these superstars on a personal, intimate basis.
Through the use of social media, followers can engage in a kind of regular “interaction,” leading them to believe that avidly consuming every piece of content a celebrity posts — whether it is a new music video or the breakfast they had for breakfast — will result in a close and personal relationship with them.
While not all of the 10-to-18-year-old fans who consider themselves a stan are at the level of “bleach my hair and go on a murderous rampage out of my obsession with this person,” that doesn’t rule out the possibility of dangers associated with this subculture of fandom among the younger demographic.
The fact that celebrities make their livings off of having an adoring and dedicated fan base is only natural for “stans” to band together and share their common interest. While these so-called communities may have cutesy names like “Arianators” for fans of the singer Ariana Grande and “Potterheads” for fans of the Harry Potter series, the underlying purposes and actions of these groups are cause for concern. “Arianators” is a term used to describe fans of the singer Ariana Grande. Targeted harassment and cyber-bullying are common features of the fan culture that surrounds being a stan, with many people attempting to establish themselves as the most dedicated, hardcore fan on the globe.
- If any celebrity decides to start a public fight with their hero, or if another audience challenges their loyalty to their idol, they will strike first and foremost.
- Some members of Nicki Minaj’s devoted fanbase, known as “The Barbz,” reacted violently when a Toronto-based writer posted a relatively mild criticism of the rapper on Twitter in 2018.
- The Saturday Night Live cast member Pete Davidson made a message on his Instagram account in 2018 that seemed to be a suicide note before deleting his account totally the following day.
- However, among the generally supportive remarks were words from Ariana Grande fans pushing him to hurt himself.
- On social media, the “mob mentality” that is so prevalent may swiftly escalate a little disagreement into a full-blown civil war.
- The bad result is that this sort of abuse becomes normalized in society and spreads into a teen’s everyday interactions — both online and in-person — as a result.
The Warning Signs of Stans
If you’re thinking about those Justin Bieber posters in your daughter’s room and wondering whether or not she’s a hardcore member of the “Belieber” stan group, don’t be concerned – it’s probable that it will be quite obvious when someone has crossed the line from fan to fanatic. A obvious clue that your youngster may be treading on the potentially perilous zone of becoming a stan would be the enormous quantity of time that stans commit to social media platforms. Many devoted fans may develop whole social media profiles based around their favorite celebrity, devoting many hours to transforming them into shrines and meeting places for other stans to gather.
Checking your children’s social media accounts for any anonymous or supplementary profiles on Instagram or Twitter is a fantastic method to keep a look out for an unhealthy obsession with a celebrity or a particular subject.
It can be difficult to tell when your child has crossed the line from being a casual fan to becoming a stan on social media, but if they are obsessively following someone on social media to the point where they are living, eating, and breathing what they post or share, it can be a red flag that they are becoming overly involved or invested in the lives of celebrities. Allowing your children to prioritize their real-life, in-person interactions above social media, or encouraging them to exclusively follow their close friends on social media, can help them develop healthy, realistic expectations of how they will engage online.
Even if they are not engaging in targeted online abuse, a youngster who is obsessed with being a stan may neglect to question the decisions made by the celebrity on whom they are fixated.
In our celebrity-obsessed world, encouraging your children to instead anchor their life in their connection with Jesus and their peers in youth group may seem like a daunting undertaking, but it is one that, as they develop, will yield fruit and bring them to real pleasure.