What Is Hellenistic Culture

Hellenistic Greece

During the year 336 BCE, Alexander the Great rose to the throne of the Greek state of Macedonia as its ruler. Alexander had established an empire that spanned from Greece all the way to India by the time he died, 13 years later. That brief but thorough empire-building drive altered the course of history: it extended Greek ideas and culture from the Eastern Mediterranean to Asia, and it changed the course of history. This time period is referred to as the “Hellenistic period” by historians. (The term “Hellenistic” originates from the Greek wordHellazein, which literally translates as “to speak Greek or identify with the Greeks.” It lasted from Alexander’s death in 323 B.C.

Macedonian Expansion

The Greek city-states were weak and disorganized near the end of the classical period, about 360 B.C., as a result of two centuries of conflict. (First, the Athenians fought against the Persians; then, during the Peloponnesian War, the Spartans fought with the Athenians; and finally, the Spartans and the Athenians battled against one another, as well as against the Thebans and the Persians.) All of this conflict made it possible for another, hitherto unexceptional city-state to come to power: Macedonia, which was ruled assertively by King Philip II during the period of the Great Schism.

Philip and the Macedonians began to expand their dominion to the north and west of the country.

  • King Philip’s generals were also the first to employ the phalanx, a large and terrifying infantry formation that is still in use today.
  • Sadly, however, this was not to be; in 336 B.C., King Philip was slain by his bodyguard Pausanias while attending his daughter’s wedding, thereby preventing him from taking advantage of the gains of his triumphs.
  • The new Macedonian monarch marched his men across the Hellespont into Asia, where they were met with fierce resistance.
  • They conquered vast swaths of western Asia and Egypt, and they continued their advance into the Indus Valley.

The Hellenistic Age

In the end, Alexander’s empire was doomed to failure and was not meant to last for very long. His generals (known as the Diadochoi), when Alexander died in 323 BC, split up the provinces that he had conquered and divided them amongst themselves. By the late fifth century, the parts of the Alexandrian empire had united to form three formidable dynasties: the Seleucids of Syria and Persia, the Ptolemies of Egypt, and the Antigonians of Greece and Macedonia. Despite the fact that these dynasties were not politically connected (after Alexander’s death, they were no longer a part of any Greek or Macedonian empire), they had a great deal in common culturally and historically.

Kingship was absolute in the Hellenistic nations, which were controlled by kings.

Having a global perspective on the world, these rulers were particularly interested in accumulating as much of its wealth and treasure as they possibly could.

It was they who brought in the ivory, gold and ebony from India; the furs and iron from the Far East, the wine from Syria and Chios, the papyrus, linen, and glass from Alexandria; the olive oil from Athens, the dates and prunes fromBabylon and Damaskos; the silver and copper from Cyprus; and the tin from as far away as Cornwall and Brittany.

They made substantial contributions to museums and zoos, as well as to libraries (such as the famed libraries of Alexandria and Pergamum) and universities, among other endeavors.

The mathematicians Euclid, Apollonios, and Archimedes, as well as the innovators Ktesibios (the water clock) and Heron, all studied at Alexandria’s university (the model steam engine).

Hellenistic Culture

People, like products, were free to travel throughout the Hellenistic kingdoms. Koine, or “the common speech,” is a variety of colloquial Greek that was spoken and read by nearly everyone throughout the old Alexandrian empire. A cultural force that brought people from all over the world together, Koine allowed them to speak with anybody in this cosmopolitan Hellenistic environment, regardless of their origin. Many others, on the other hand, felt alienated in this new political and cultural scene at the same time.

There were a large number of individuals who joined “mystery religions,” such as cults dedicated to the goddesses Isis and Fortune, which promised its adherents immortality and personal fortune.

Diogenes the Cynic lived his life as a protest against commercialism and cosmopolitanism, and he was known as the “Cynic.” His political opponents were “the lackeys of the mob,” and the theater was “a peep show for fools,” according to him.

The Stoics, on the other hand, believed that every individual man has a divine spark that could be developed by the practice of a virtuous and noble life.

Hellenistic Art

When it came to Hellenistic art and literature, this estrangement manifested itself in a rejection of the collective demos and a focus on the individuality. People were depicted in sculptures and paintings, rather than idealized “types,” in order to convey realism. Famous works of Hellenistic art include “Winged Victory of Samothrace,” “Laocoön and His Sons,” “Venus de Milo,” “Venus de Milo II,” “Dying Gaul,” “Boy with Thorn,” and “Boxer at Rest.”

The End of the Hellenistic Age

Despite the fact that the Hellenistic civilization was conquered by the Romans in phases, the era came to a close in 31 B.C. It was in that year that the Roman Octavian beat Mark Antony’s Ptolemaic fleet in the Battle of Actium. Octavian was given the title of Augustus and was proclaimed the first Roman emperor. In spite of the Hellenistic period’s comparatively brief existence, the cultural and intellectual life of the age has had an impact on generations of readers, authors, painters, and scientists ever since.

The Hellenistic Period-Cultural & Historical Overview

It is generally agreed that the Hellenistic period encompasses the three centuries of Greek history that occurred between the death of the Macedonian monarch Alexander the Great in 323 B.C.E. and the ascension of Augustus to the throne of Rome in 31 B.C.E. (1). The death of Alexander the Great left his huge captured realm without a clear line of succession, and his greatest generals split it up into numerous vast kingdoms once he was defeated.

The establishment of new autonomous governments, together with the expansion of Greek culture as far afield as India, set the ground for significant shifts in the way that Greeks perceived themselves and the world in which they existed.

Society, ThoughtReligion

Greek art and culture have always been impacted by foreign cultures, but the extension of Greek territory during Alexander the Great’s conquests created more opportunities for mutual cultural interactions between the two countries. In the Greek world, these contacts contributed to the development of a new cosmopolitanism, which in turn inspired the desire to comprehend, respect, and reflect the diversity of particular peoples. Individuals’ increased mobility, made possible by territorial expansion, also drove them to seek a sense of meaning and belonging in their lives.

404-323 B.C.E.)found their followings and had an impact on succeeding generations of people.

An increase in interest in mystery cults, which typically promised rewards in the form of a better afterlife, was fueled by individualistic impulses (2).

As Hellenistic monarchs and queens began to be worshipped alongside gods, ruler-cults grew increasingly popular.

The Arts

Art blossomed throughout the Hellenistic period as painters experimented with new ways of conveying emotional impacts, unique experiences, and intricate details in their works. Architecture evolved as a vehicle of expressing a fascination with the dramatic (4), whether by monumental structures, such as the Sanctuary of Athena on the island of Lindos, or through inventive design, such as the Sanctuary of Apollo at Didyma. Religious structures were frequently constructed to provide visitors with a physical and emotional experience that corresponded to their religious experience; they were intended to elicit sentiments of awe, revelation, and ecstasy in the hearts of those who entered (5).

Artists also experimented with whirling drapery, as exemplified by the famousNike of Samothrace, and the feminine nude, as exemplified by the Aphrodite of Knidos, among other things.

To provide an example, the Ludovisi Gaul demonstrates the great drama that is characteristic of the Hellenistic era while urging, if not requiring, the observer to circle it in order to take it all in.

Some forms of Hellenistic Greek pottery became more elaborate and colorful as a result of improvements in art and architecture, which paralleled developments in pottery.

Other types of pottery were created to replicate in clay the opulent bronze, silver, and gold tablewares used by imperial families and other members of society who belonged to the upper classes (7).

Conquered Greece

The Hellenistic period, despite the flourishing of cultural interaction and creative invention, is the final epoch of autonomous Greek civilisation, approaching the end of its reign as a new power emerged in the western world. Italy’s capital, Rome, had already captured the Greek cities and towns of southern Italy and Sicily, notably Paestum and Syracuse, and was eager to expand its empire further by capturing mainland Greece and the rest of the Hellenistic kingdoms as well. Rome captured Corinth in 146 BCE, while the city of Athens was besieged by Roman soldiers in 86 BCE, both cities falling to the Romans.

Art was transported in large quantities from Greece to Rome, where it was widely imitated by Roman artists in the fields of sculpture, painting, and architectural design (8).

The arts of ancient Greece remained to have an impact on creative expression even after the region’s authority was transferred from Greece to Rome, as Horace demonstrates.

Footnotes

  1. The Hellenistic period, despite the flourishing of cultural interaction and creative invention, is the final epoch of autonomous Greek civilisation, approaching the end of its reign as a new power developed in the west. Italy’s capital, Rome, had already captured the Greek cities and towns of southern Italy and Sicily, notably Paestum and Syracuse, and was eager to expand its empire further by capturing mainland Greece and the other Hellenistic kingdoms. Rome captured Corinth in 146 BCE, while the city of Athens was besieged by Roman forces in 86 BCE, and both cities were ravaged. Despite the fact that Greece was a conquered land, the Romans admired and even mimicked many aspects of Greek culture, especially in the realm of art. Greece’s art was transported to Rome in large quantities, and the Romans’ sculpture, painting, and architecture were all heavily influenced by Greek models and styles (8). In reality, when writing of the conquest of Greece, the Roman poet Horace (Epistles2.1.156-157) stated (8):Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit and artis intulit agresti In LatioCaptive, Greece conquered its barbarous conqueror and introduced the arts to the rustic province of Latium. It is obvious from Horace’s words that, despite the transfer of regional leadership from Greece to Rome, the arts of ancient Greece remained to have an impact on creative expression from the Roman period until the present.

Hellenistic age

The Hellenistic period, which included the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East from the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BCE and the conquest of Egypt by Rome in 30 BCE, is defined as follows: A period of three and a half centuries is added to the end of the era for various purposes in order to account for Constantine the Great’s relocation of his capital from Rome to Constantinople (Byzantium) in 330ce.

Following the disintegration of Alexander’s empire, a number of realms arose, including the Macedonian, the Seleucid, and the Ptolemaic, which served as a framework for the spread of Greek (Hellenic) culture, the mixing of Greeks with other populations, and the fusion of Greek and Eastern elements, among other things.

Political developments

It is impossible to overstate the importance of Alexander the Great’s personality than the way in which those who had appeared to be pygmies at his side rose to become leaders of the world he had left behind. Rhoxane’s son Alexander IV (323–310), born after his father’s death in August, was declared king as Philip III Arrhidaeus (c.358–317), the only male relative who was not a mentally deficient, illegitimate son of Philip. Both were only figureheads for the time being. Antipater’s authority in Macedonia and Greece has been confirmed for the time being.

  1. 365–321) and Craterus (c.
  2. Alexander’s continued intentions were abandoned as a result of a unanimous decision.
  3. As with Antipater, Antigonus Monophthalmos (also known as “The One-Eyed”; c.382–301) was not present in Babylon at the time of Alexander’s death in 323.
  4. His toughness and tact were well-liked by the citizens of the Greek cities.
  5. He was able to gain for himself the governorship of Egypt, where he had ambitions to establish an independent state.
  6. He died in 281.
  7. The troops looked down their noses atEumenesof Cardia, who was in charge of civil administration and so understood more about the empire than anybody else.
You might be interested:  How Do You Pass A Culture Index Survey

Did the Greeks and the Romans have a goddess of love that they worshipped?

In this quiz about wars, philosophers, and everything else related to ancient Greece, you must distinguish between fact and fiction.

More difficult to manage was the unrest in Greece, which was spearheaded by the Athenians and aimed at freeing the towns from Macedonian garrisons.

Antipater was under pressure in Lama for a period of time (the battle between 323 and 322, known as the Lamian War).

Antipater was victorious in the end, Athens capitulated, and Demosthenes (the voice and emblem of anti-Macedonian hatred) committed himself as a result.

The tale of the power struggle that unfolded over the following two decades or more is extremely intricate and difficult to follow.

It was the troops that installed Antipater as regent (Craterus had been killed in combat), and Antigonus was appointed commander of the army in Asia, with Antipater’s son Cassius(c.358–297) serving at Antigonus’ side as second-in-command.

Then, in 319, Antipater died and was succeeded by a veteran commander but inexperienced politician named Polyperchon, who attempted to win the support of the Greeks on the mainland by issuing a fresh declaration of their freedoms.

The conflict erupted.

Seleucus managed to flee to Egypt.

When Cassander conquered Macedonia and most of Greece, he rebuilt Thebes and placed the AristotelianDemetrius of Phalerum in charge of the city-state of Athens.

Cassander put her to death while keeping Rhoxane and Alexander IV under his protection—or watch, depending on how you look at it.

He was opposed by a coalition that included Cassander, Ptolemy, and Lysimachus.

Antigonus demonstrated that he was energetic, resourceful, and imaginative, but he was unable to deliver a decisive strike.

Eventually, in 311, the four kings decided to partition the globe, leaving Ptolemy in charge of Egypt and Cyprus, Antigonus in charge of Asia, Lysimachus in charge of Thrace, and Cassander in charge of Macedonia and Greece, but only until Alexander IV reached the age of majority in 305.

But in the chase of power, royal blood was soon forgotten about and forgotten about once again.

Seleucus, on the other hand, managed to hold on to a battered Babylon and the eastern provinces, with the exception of India, which he was forced to cede to the Indian kingChandragupta.

Demetrius, who died in 306, defeated Ptolemy in a naval battle and gained control of Cyprus and the Aegean, however he was unsuccessful in his epic siege ofRhodes (305–304), which is still remembered today.

Antigonus, on the other hand, was unsuccessful in his attempt to conquer Egypt, and the other rulers adopted the title of king.

Demetrius managed to flee, keeping control of Tyre and Sidon as well as command of the sea.

Cassander, a politician, was responsible for the founding of two magnificent towns, Cassandreia and Thessalonica, as well as the reconstruction of Thebes.

The Greek king Demetrius captured the majority of Greece and secured Macedonia in 294, but he was deposed in 288 by Lysimachus, who allied himself with King Pyrrhus of Epirus (319–272) and overthrew him.

He became ill, however, and was forced to submit to Seleucus, who provided him with several opportunities to drink himself to death.

As a result of Demetrius’ defeat, Ptolemy acquired control of the sea.

Lysimachus, on the other hand, was losing support because of a son by his first marriage, Ptolemy Ceraunus, the Thunderbolt (grandson of Antipater), who was stirring up trouble in the area around him.

Ceraunus, on the other hand, was supported by Lysimachus’ soldiers, and he was the one who assassinated Seleucus in 281.

Athens was ruled by Antigonus Gonatas (c.320–239), the brilliant Demetrius’s son and himself a man of good character, talent, and education; and Pyrrhus, the king of Epirus, who was the most powerful ruler in Greece proper.

At this point, the influx of Celts under the command of Bolgius and Brennus created an additional complication, not the least of which was Ceraunus’ defeat and death.

Due to the threat posed by the invading Celts, Antigonus and Antiochus signed a contract in 279, in which they pledged not to meddle in one another’s zones of power.

Antigonus was successful in gaining control of Macedonia. The kingdom of Lysimachus was never re-established. Macedonia, Syria, and Egypt were the three major power centers of the time.

Hellenistic age – Hellenistic civilization

It is impossible to overstate the importance of Alexander the Great’s personality than the way in which persons who had appeared to be pygmies at his side rose to become world leaders after he had passed away. When it came to ruling, blood still mattered: Philip III Arrhidaeus (c.358–317), Philip’s only male relative and an illegitimate son of Philip, was proclaimed king along with Rhoxane’s son Alexander IV (323/310), who was born shortly after his father’s death in August; both were merely symbolic figures.

  • 365–321) and Craterus (c.
  • Alexander’s continued intentions were scrapped as a result of a unanimous decision by the group.
  • At the time of Alexander’s death in 323, Antigonus Monophthalmos (“The One-Eyed”), like Antipater, was not present in Babylon.
  • He was well-liked throughout the Greek cities for his toughness and tact.
  • He succeeded in obtaining the governorship of Egypt, where he hoped to establish a kingdom on his own terms and in his own image.
  • Awaiting the outcome of the battle were Leonnatus and Seleucus, two of the others who were well-known for their physical and military abilities.
  • Test your knowledge of the Britannica.

Did the Greeks and the Romans have a goddess of love that they prayed to or worshipped?

Examine wars, philosophers, and other aspects of ancient Greece in this quiz to distinguish reality from fiction.

The unrest in Greece, which was sponsored by the Athenians and aimed at freeing the towns from Macedonian garrisons, was more difficult to keep under control.

The Lamian War, which lasted from 323 to 322, put Antipater under considerable pressure in Lama.

He was slain in the process.

Macedonian power was restored autocratically by Antipater, who made no pretense about a “free” League of Corinth and instead focused on restoring Macedonian sovereignty.

In the first instance, Perdiccas, who was reigning on behalf of the two monarchs with the assistance of Eumenes, was accused of personal ambition and slain.

Ptolemy was safe in Egypt; Seleucus (c.358–281), governor of Babylon, and Lysimachus (c.358–281), governor of Thrace, continued to watch and wait; and Eumenes, a non-Macedonian with a fortune behind him, could claim to represent the kings in their struggle against the ambitions of generals and governors.

  • Thus, the Athenians took advantage of newfound independence to kill the pro-Macedonians, including the honorable but compromising Phocion.
  • Eumenes, who was allied with Polyperchon, defeated Antigonus and captured Babylon, but he was deceived and died in 316.
  • Fortunately for Polyperchon, he was quickly deposed by the capable and up-and-coming Cassiander.
  • The dreadful Olympias, Alexander the Great’s mother, had succeeded in eliminating Philip III from power.
  • Antigonus had risen to the top of the old brigade’s hierarchy by this point.
  • They battled ineffectively for four years (315–311).
  • It was only via a great coup that Seleucus was able to retake control of Babylon that there was any significant change.
  • Seleucus was omitted from the list of participants.
  • After Antigonus had failed in his attempt to overthrow Seleucus, Cassander killed Rhoxane and infant Alexander in 310.

Antigonus now had the effective support of his brilliant sonDemetrius(336–283), known as Poliorcetes, or Besieger, who ousted the other Demetrius and restored democracy in Corinth, eventually leading to the formation of the League of Corinth; he was hailed with divine honors and given the Parthenon as his palace.

  1. Having declared themselves joint kings in succession to Alexander, Antigonus and Demetrius announced themselves as such.
  2. Seleucus organized an alliance of four generals against Antigonus and Demetrius, and the allies defeated and killed Antigonus in the battle of Ipsus in 301.
  3. A substantial amount of Anatolia was taken by Lysimachus, while Seleucus consolidated authority over most of Mesopotamia and Syria, with the exception of a region in the south that was held by Ptolemy; and Cassander was happy with Macedonia and portions of Greece.
  4. Further upheavals were to follow after his death in 2907.
  5. In order to gain Asia, Demetrius devoted all of his resources, and he almost achieved success.
  6. The stage was prepared for a showdown between Lysimachus and Seleucus to take place later that night.
  7. As Alexander’s only surviving heir, Ptolemy II Philadelphus died quietly in his bed, and was succeeded by his son, Ptolemy II Philadelphus(308–246), who reigned peacefully after him.

Following Alexander’s victory over Lysimachus and the subsequent death of the latter, it appeared that Alexander’s empire, with the exception of Egypt, was his to claim.

Ultimately, Antiochus I (324–261) was succeeded by Seleucus’ son by a Sogdian noblewoman.

It was at this time that Pyrrhus embarked on his ill-fated journey to Italy, where he soundly destroyed the expanding strength of Rome, but only at the expense of his own life.

Aetolians repelled Brennus’ attempt to press his way down into Greece.

A significant victory was achieved by each over the Celtic invaders, who finally settled in Serbia, Thrace, and Galicia in central Anatolia.

With Antigonus’ help, Macedonia was successfully conquered. The kingdom of Lysimachus was never re-established after his death. It was Macedonia, Syria, and Egypt that served as the three power centers of the world.

The administration of Ptolemaic Egypt

According to the twentieth-century historian Frank William Walbank, Ptolemaic Egypt constituted “a large-scale experiment in bureaucratic centralism and inmercantilism.” There was a continual requirement to import materials that were not easily accessible in the country, such as the lumber and pitch required for warships and the mercantile fleet, as well as gold and other precious materials. In 258 bce, Demetrius, the main executive of themint in Alexandria, wrote to Ptolemy II’s finance minister, Apollonius, on the necessity of importing as much gold as possible into the city of Alexandria.

  1. Exports included linen, papaya, faience, and finally glass (all of which were subjected to severe quality control), as well as grain when the need called for it.
  2. There was a military government in place, as well as a complicated financial administration in charge of collecting rents and taxes.
  3. The king, in principle, claimed all of the land and leased it out to peasants on short leases, supplying the seed corn in exchange for the repayment of the equivalent in other grains of rice.
  4. Licenses, taxes, and price-fixing were used to maintain control over other aspects of agriculture.
  5. However, it is possible that it was not always as organized, efficient, and incorrupt as it appears or as some admirers have suggested.
  6. The installation of a Macedonian and Greek governing elite, which occupied the highest echelons of the public service, was the most significant transformation.
  7. When there was disagreement, it was because “I do not know how to behave like a Greek,” like in the case of a camel driver who complained about not being paid.

The remarkableCleopatra VI I, on the other hand, was the first royal to become fluent in the local tongue. Egypt was and remained extraordinarily affluent, despite the fact that its governance had flaws, and the Romans were glad to acquire Egypt’s earnings and grain.

Military developments

Imaginative generalship and inspirational leadership, along with the employment of elite troops that had been specifically trained and equipped, enabled Philip II and Alexander the Great to achieve their conquests. The asarissa, a long, heavy spear used by the Macedonianphalanx, was essential to their success. The forces were formed into battalions of around 1,500 men, which were arranged in 15 rows deep. The spears of the 11 rows at the rear were held vertically, forcing them to tower formidably over the rest of the army.

  • They wore helmets, leather corselets, and metal greaves (shin plates) as defensive armour, and each carried a tiny round shield to protect themselves.
  • In addition to a shorter spear and a scimitar, the Companions’ heavy cavalry used metal helmets and breastplates to protect themselves from the elements.
  • On the flanks of the phalanx were warriors that were somewhat mobile: light cavalry, slingers and archers, javelin men, and light infantry, to name a few examples.
  • By around 200 BC, the number of Greek, Crete, and Balkan warriors had diminished, and a large number of Syrian men had been recruited from the Syrian lands.
  • The use of mercenaries increased the number of desertions and the amount of looting, which in turn necessitated the implementation of more strict discipline in the field.
  • In most cases, surrender on favorable conditions was followed by the payment of a ransom payment.
  • He employed saps and mines, timbered galleries, catapults and stone throwers, siege towers, scaling ladders, and coverings to carry out tasks like as filling ditches and bringing battering rams to bear on his opponents.
  • Demetrius and Philip Vwere the only two successors who achieved a high level of notoriety for their siege warfare skills.
  • In the battle with Sparta, Ptolemy II’s fleet of 336 ships was far less than that of Athens.
  • It was even possible to utilize bigger vessels, such as a 16-oarer with two banks of oars and eight men to an oar, for example.

There have even been reports of a 40-oarer. Macedonian naval forces controlled much of the Aegean, while Egyptian naval forces controlled much of the eastern Mediterranean. However, there were several swings, and Rhodes was never a negligible factor.

Definition of Hellenism

/ hl nz m/ / hl nz m/ / hl nz m/ nounthe culture or ideas of ancient Greece Hellenism is defined as the copying or adoption of ancient Greek language, thinking, traditions, art, and other aspects of culture: the Hellenism of Alexandrian Jews. the distinctive qualities of Greek culture, particularly following the reign of Alexander the Great; the civilization of the Hellenistic era EVALUATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF AFFECT AND EFFECT VERSUS AFFECT! In effect, this exam will determine whether or not you possess the necessary abilities to distinguish between the terms “affect” and “effect.” Despite the wet weather, I was in high spirits on the day of my graduation celebrations.

You might be interested:  What Is Goth Culture

Origin ofHellenism

Idiom: hlnzm (hlnzm is an abbreviation for halnzm). ancient Greek culture or ideas are defined as follows: a practice of imitating or adopting aspects of ancient Greek culture such as language, thinking, rituals, art, and so forth: the Hellenism of Alexandrian Jews aspects of Greek culture, particularly after the reign of Alexander the Great; the civilisation of the Hellenistic era; PLAY A FACTOR VS. EFFECT SURVEY AND SEE HOW YOU DO! Overall, this quiz will determine whether or not you possess the necessary abilities to distinguish between the terms “affect” and “effect.” My delighted feelings on graduation day were not dampened by the wet weather.

Words nearbyHellenism

The words Helleborin,helleborine,Hellen,Hellene,Hellenic,Hellenic,Hellenism,Hellenist,Hellenistic,Hellenistic Age,Hellenize,hellerDictionary.com and Helleborin,helleborine can be found in the following words: Helleborin Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Helleborine Unabridged Random House, Inc. 2022, based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, Random House, Inc.

How to useHellenismin a sentence

  • Even in the best-case scenarios, philologists are looking for little more than “rationalism” and Alexandrian culture, rather than Hellenism. That is, Hellenism is a marvel of beauty on par with Christianity in terms of holiness
  • Hellenism and Christianity are not mutually exclusive. Hellenism had a far longer shelf life than the other faiths of the Roman Empire. When it comes to Hebraism, the notion is behaviour and obedience
  • When it comes to Hellenism, it is seeing things as they are.
  • In the event we assume that Livius symbolizes the response against an already dominating Hellenism, we will be closer to the reality than supposing otherwise.

British Dictionary definitions forHellenism

Classical Greek civilisation is defined by the concepts, values, and aspirations connected with it. The spirit or national character of the Greeks is defined by conformance to, imitation of, or commitment to the culture of ancient Greece. the Hellenistic world’s global civilisation is defined as follows: 2012 Digital Edition of the Collins English Dictionary – Complete Unabridged Edition (William Collins SonsCo. Ltd. 1979, 1986) In 1998, HarperCollinsPublishers published the following books: 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, and 2012.

6.4 The Spread of Hellenistic Culture – Teaching California

The period 336 BCE to 50 CE was a watershed moment in the history of the world: Afroeurasia became far more integrated than it had ever been before. Traders were able to ship goods from China to Spain for the first time since trade routes were established connecting the majority of Afroeurasia, from the Atlantic to Pacific. The Greeks played a significant role in the early phases of the establishment of such telecommunications links. This collection makes use of art pieces to demonstrate the existence of linkages between civilizations.

  • Students should be guided by maps.
  • All of the changes brought about by the Greeks may be divided into two categories: increased trade and the development of Hellenistic culture.
  • They created a strong link of commerce and exchange with India and Central Asia that has never been severed since that time.
  • The initial link in the chain was the expansion of trade and culture throughout the Mediterranean and southern Asia, which served as a springboard for subsequent links.
  • A new manner of exchanging products was invented by the Greeks, who established hundreds of colonies around the Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, and they used money in a public marketplace to do so.
  • Persian Empire was the most powerful empire at the time, and Greeks, in addition to conducting battles against them, engaged in commerce with the Persians, traveled to Persia, and were familiar with Iranian culture (sources 1 and 2).
  • During his father’s reign, Philip of Macedon (a kingdom located in northern Greece) amassed a formidable military force, which he utilized to conquer the Greek city-states.
  • Alexander destroyed empires, emperors, and nations before he died at the age of 33, leaving a legacy of destruction.
  • A new multicultural kingdom was to be established by intermarrying Macedonians with Bactrians and Persians, and by educating children from conquered peoples to use Macedonian weaponry, according to the accounts in Source 3.
  • Aspects of Greek culture included the use of the Greek language, Greek-style education (for both mind and body) in gymnasiums, athletic competitions, political and philosophical discussions, theaters, and various styles of art, architecture, dress and entertainment.
  • Hellenism did not displace indigenous cultures; rather, it provided the rich elites with an extremely appealing alternative culture.

Aside from the Greeks’ contribution to cultural diffusion, the greatest achievements of the Hellenistic period resulted from the synthesis — or the mixing and joining together of knowledge, products, and technologies from Persian (Indian), Central Asian, Egyptian, and other cultures with Greek culture — over a period of several centuries.

  1. These successor kingdoms served as the third link in the chain.
  2. He and his successors depicted themselves in both Greek and Egyptian styles over the course of the following 300 years, in literature as well as sculptures.
  3. Egyptians adopted Hellenism, and Greeks and other Hellenistic people adopted Egyptian fashions and ideas, as part of a larger interchange that included both sides of the Mediterranean.
  4. Seleucus, Alexander’s commander, established the Seleucid Empire, which included Syria and Persia.
  5. Despite the fact that the Seleucids managed to hold on to some territory until the mid-first century BCE, the Parthians emerged as the eventual winner.
  6. Another successor state was the Graeco-Bactria monarchy, which was located in Central Asia.
  7. (the fifth link).

By establishing contacts with the Hellenistic world through the Greek-style towns and Greek-speaking people who resided in the area, the Maurya were able to spread their rule further north and further west (sources 7 and 8).

A biographer of Alexander of Macedon, the Greek historian Arrian, published his history of Alexander in the second century CE, 400 years after the death of Alexander.

The sentences are extensive and complicated; there are numerous names and locations, as well as foreign terminology; and Arrian just describes events without explaining their ramifications or meanings.

Using this method, you may improve understanding by breaking down phrases into smaller components and clarifying the actors, actions, and references in the sentences.

Readers with more advanced skills should take on the full material.

First reading is an individual silent read, second reading is a whole class sentence deconstruction and referencing exercise, third reading is text annotation, and fourth reading is to answer a question that is based on the text.

Directions 1.

This will serve as the Student Handout.

The vocabulary list should be included in both versions of the document.

Then have them read the first paragraph aloud to themselves to get their attention.

Instruct students to turn to a partner and debate the following: What is the topic of this paragraph?

Students should underline or draw a box around every mention of a place or group of people (not their first names, but the identifier, such as “of Bactria”).

5.

Students should be tasked with locating all of the locations on the map.

6.

Inform them that the sentences contain a large number of clauses, each of which has a subject, and that they must therefore search for a large number of subjects (coming before verbs.) 7.

Then, using arrows, identify all of the referrers in your database.

8.

Take a look at the above.

Students should be informed that this is written in the passive mode, and they should be asked who donated (Alexander) and what was given (brides).

9.

The phrase “the territory he had previously conquered” is the one to pay attention to in paragraph 4.

Students should examine the map and identify the locations that would be included in the summary sentence you have provided (Persia, Arachosia, Mesopotamia, Bactria, etc.) As a result, the boys would have been Persian, Arachosian, and so on.

In 8, pay close attention to the verb phrase “it is said that their arrival triggered.” It is speculated that Arrian learned about this through one of the older histories, but it is also possible that Arrian himself was doubtful of the information and did not wish to portray it as truth in his work.

Divide the students into pairs and instruct them to annotate the text, as well as to write questions or notes in the margins They should draw attention to evidence that will assist them in answering the reading prompt.

Discuss the topic with the entire class and respond to their questions.

Question 12: How did Alexander attempt to blend Macedonian, Greek, Persian, and Bactrian people and cultures?

Have students respond to the reading question: With the students, go through some of their responses and make the connection between the reading question and the bigger question of this source set: When it comes to developing linkages among places in Afroeurasia, how did the expansion of Greek trade, travel, and colonies, followed by the conquests of Alexander the Great and the diffusion of Hellenistic civilization, play a role?

You might just tell the students (and have them write it down) that Alexander was attempting to establish a multicultural society based on Hellenism, that conquered people were more likely to adopt Hellenistic ideas and government if their own culture and ideas were included, and that Alexander’s policies helped the influence of Hellenism to continue in the lands he conquered long after he died.

His activities aided in the integration of all of the territories he conquered. 6.4 Documents to be distributed The Expansion of Hellenistic Cultural Traditions In this lesson, students will learn about the spread of Hellenistic culture. The Teacher’s Key

  • An important milestone in world history occurred between 336 BCE and 50 CE: Afroeurasia became significantly more interconnected than it had ever been before. When trade routes first connected most of Afroeurasia, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, products could actually travel from China to Spain for the first time. Early on in the process of establishing those ties, the Greeks played an important role. This set makes use of art objects to demonstrate the connections that exist between different cultures and civilizations. This topic is complicated due to the large number of people and geographic areas involved. Students can be guided by maps. Using a map, track down every name and movement. All of the modifications brought about by the Greeks can be divided into two categories: increased trade and the development of Hellenistic culture. Initially, the Greeks (and others) spread their culture throughout the Mediterranean, and then Alexander and the Hellenistic kingdoms expanded trade and culture eastward to India, north into Central Asia, and south into Africa, respectively. They established a strong connection of trade and exchange with India and Central Asia that has never been broken since then. (Other exchanges, such as those that took place along the Silk Road, later linked China to the rest of Africa and Eurasia.) It’s helpful to think of this lesson as a chain that needs to be assembled one link at a time. It was the spread of trade and culture throughout the Mediterranean region and southwestern Asia that served as the first link in this chain. Throughout history, Greeks and other people living around the Mediterranean Sea have used sea travel and trade to connect their city-states. This dates back to the eighth century BC. A new way of exchanging goods was developed by the Greeks, who established hundreds of colonies along the Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, and they used money in a public marketplace. Greece interacted with a variety of cultures in northern and eastern Africa, southwest Asia, and Europe during the Classical Period (the fifth and fourth centuries BC). As a result, in addition to waging wars against the Persian Empire, Greeks engaged in commercial transactions with the Persians, visited Persia, and became acquainted with Persian culture (sources 1 and 2). The second link was built by Alexander the Great. During his father’s reign, Philip of Macedon (a state located in northern Greece) amassed a formidable military force, which he employed to conquer the Greek city-states. In 336, his son Alexander led that army to victory over the Persian Empire and other states as far east as the Indus River, completing the conquest of the world. Alexander swept empires, rulers, and states aside before he died at the age of 33. His objectives also included the establishment of economic networks and the promotion of cultural interchange among all of these nations. A new multicultural kingdom was to be established by intermarrying Macedonians with Bactrians and Persians, and by educating children from conquered peoples to use Macedonian weapons, according to the narrative in Source 3. Along the way, he instituted trade-friendly legislation and circumstances, built towns in the pattern of Greek cities, and brought the set of Greek cultural traditions known as “Hellenism” to the countries he conquered. Aspects of Greek culture included the use of the Greek language, Greek-style education (for both mind and body) in gymnasiums, athletic competitions, political and philosophical discussions, theaters, and different styles of art, architecture, dress and entertainment. Hellenism was also referred to as Hellenistic culture in some circles. In contrast to indigenous cultures, Hellenism provided a tremendously appealing alternative culture to the rich elites. Throughout history, elites from Spain to India have participated in Hellenistic culture and have achieved the status of “cosmopolitan,” or a citizen of the globe rather than just of a particular city or country. However, despite the fact that the Greeks were the ones who started the cultural spread, the greatest achievements of the Hellenistic period resulted from the synthesis — the blending and assembling — of knowledge, products, and technologies from Persian, Indian, Central Asian, and Egyptian cultures with those of Greek culture. In 323, after Alexander died, his generals split his conquests into four separate kingdoms, each with its own monarch. They served as the third link in the chain of succession. With the establishment of the Ptolemaic Empire, Ptolemy consolidated his control over Egypt. He and his successors expressed themselves in both Greek and Egyptian styles over the course of the following 300 years, in literature as well as sculptures and reliefs. Aside from that, they promoted interconnectivity in commerce as well as currency use and the use of Greek language in Egypt (Source 4). Egyptians adopted Hellenism, and Greeks and other Hellenistic people adopted Egyptian aesthetics and ideas, as part of a larger interchange that included both Egyptians and Greeks. Merchants and sailors travelled down the east coast of Africa and around the Arabian Sea during the reign of the Ptolemies in order to trade with India (Source 5). Syria and Persia were incorporated into the Seleucid Empire by Alexander’s commander Seleucus. His policies of fostering commerce, cultural interaction, and Hellenism were carried over from Alexander’s time, but in 247 BCE the Parthians, a nation who resided on the borderland between Persia and Central Asia, began to encircle and conquer areas of Persia. The Seleucids managed to hold on to some territory until the middle of the first century BCE, but the Parthians were the eventual victor in the battle for land. Source 6 reports that, despite the change of rule, Hellenistic influences persisted in Persia, and the Parthians carried on with their trading practices, therefore adding a fourth link to the chain of civilization. Graeco-Bactria, a successor kingdom in Central Asia, was another example of a successful successor monarchy. As a result of Hellenistic kings, commerce, and cultural influences, that region became a crucial connection between east and west via the Silk Road (the fifth link). The Hellenistic kingdoms had commerce and ties with the Mauryan Empire in India, as well as with other European powers. By establishing contacts with the Hellenistic world through the Greek-style towns and Greek-speaking people who resided in the area, the Maurya were able to extend their rule further north and west (sources 7 and 8). In the chain that connected Afroeurasia from the Atlantic to India and Central Asia, this was the sixth link in the chain of events. Approximately 400 years after Alexander’s death, the Greek historian Arrian penned this history of Alexander of Macedon in the second century CE. In particular, sixth graders who are English learners or who read below grade level will find the translation to be challenging to complete. The sentences are extensive and complicated
  • There are numerous names and locations, as well as foreign terminology
  • And Arrian just tells events without explaining their ramifications or consequences. An effective close reading method can aid pupils in comprehending this tough literature. Using this method, you may improve understanding by breaking down phrases into smaller components and clarifying the actors, actions, and allusions in each sentence. Given the time constraints, we will limit ourselves to a few essential lines from the reading in the section after this. Text should be tackled in its entirety by more advanced readers. Following are the instructions for a close reading activity that should be done with a teacher. First reading is an individual silent read, second reading is a whole class sentence deconstruction and referencing exercise, third reading is text annotation, and the fourth reading is to answer a text-dependent question, as described above. a question about what you’ve read How did Alexander attempt to blend the people and cultures of Macedonia, Greece, Persia, and Bactria? Directions 1. Create a condensed version of Source 3 for English learners and those who read at or below grade level. This is the Student Handout. Please provide the whole excerpt for more advanced readers. Including the word list in both translations is highly recommended. Review the vocabulary list with the students in step 2. Then have them read the first paragraph aloud to themselves to reinforce their understanding. Ask students to pair up and debate the following question: What is the topic of this paragraph? Exactly what had happened was not clear. Students should underline or draw a box around every mention of a place or group of people (not the first names of people, but the identifier, such as “of Bactria”) in the text. During the reign of Oxyartes, Bactria was ruled. A map of Alexander’s conquests should then be displayed or distributed. Students should use the map to find all of the locations. Students should pinpoint the center of the Persian Empire — the southern section of what is now the country of Iran — in order to understand the Persians and Medieval Europeans. Sixth, instruct pupils to emphasize each and every subject. Explain to them that the sentences contain a large number of clauses, each of which has a subject, and that they must therefore search for a large number of subjects in the sentences (coming before verbs.) 7. Overhead project the shorter text and go through which points should be emphasized in the final draft. Use arrows to quickly identify all of the referrers after that! Make pupils draw arrows on their papers to help them remember what they learned. Allow pupils to complete the sentence by circling all of the verbs or verb phrases they encounter. The overhead is being reviewed. In the third line, pay attention to the word “were provided.” Students should be informed that this is written in the passive voice, and they should be asked who donated (Alexander) and what they were given (brides). During this period, it is particularly appropriate to explore marriage traditions among elites in the ancient world, which included planned unions for both grooms and wives. In order to write the second paragraph, repeat steps 3 through 8. The phrase “the regions he had previously overrun” is the one to pay attention to in 4. Instruct the students that phrase refers to all of the territories that Alexander had conquered. Students should examine the map and identify the locations that would be included in the summary sentence you have provided them with (Persia, Arachosia, Mesopotamia, Bactria, etc.) This would have made them Persian, Arachosian, and so on. It’s possible that the governors were Macedonians or from the surrounding region. Look for the verb phrase “it is said that their arrival caused” in the eighth paragraph. It is speculated that Arrian learned about this from one of the previous histories, but it is also possible that Arrian himself was doubtful of the information and did not wish to include it as truth in his history. To make sure that the class recognizes the meaning of “their arrival,” ask the students to draw an arrow that points toward the source of confusion. Divide the students into pairs and instruct them to annotate the text, as well as to write questions or notes in the margins. In order to answer the reading question, they should highlight evidence that will assist them. elmo with a number of student notes projected on it (overhead projector.). Discuss the topic with the entire class and respond to any questions they might have. For pupils who need help citing evidence in their writing, you may use this occasion to demonstrate how to condense big phrases into shorter ones when quoting from sources. Question 12: How did Alexander attempt to blend Macedonian, Greek, Persian, and Bactrian people and cultures? Have students respond to the reading question. With the class, go through some of their responses and make a connection between the reading question and the bigger question of this source collection. When it comes to developing linkages among places in Afroeurasia, how did the expansion of Greek trade, travel, and colonies, followed by the conquests of Alexander the Great and the diffusion of Hellenistic civilization, play a part? Assuming that students are struggling with this level of abstract thinking, you might simply tell them (and have them write it down) that Alexander was attempting to create a multicultural society based on Hellenism, that conquered people were more likely to adopt Hellenistic ideas and government if their own culture and ideas were included, and that Alexander’s policies helped the influence of Hellenism continue in the lands he conquered after he himself died. His activities aided in the linking of all the places he conquered and united them under his leadership. 6.4.1 Materials to be distributed Greek Culture’s Expansion Throughout the World Assignment 6.4: The Spread of Hellenistic Culture (Student Handout) the key to success for educators
  • NARA (National Archives and Records Administration) is an acronym that stands for National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has prepared a large collection of document analysis worksheets that are ready for use in the classroom. Their website provides schools with a comprehensive array of customized tools that may be used to work with images, maps, written documents, and other media types. Young learners as well as intermediate and secondary pupils have benefited from the customization of NARA’s tools
You might be interested:  What Culture Twitter

Hellenistic Period

Historically, the Hellenistic Period is considered to be a component of the Ancient Period in the European and Near Asian regions. The usage of this period is supported by the prevalence of Hellenic culture in most of these places, which is a result of the Greek political presence, particularly in Asia after Alexander’s conquests, as well as a fresh wave of Greek colonization during this time period. The Hellenistic Period, as a result, is generally believed to have begun in 323 BCE with Alexander’s defeat and ended in 31 BCE with the conquest of the last Hellenistic monarchy by Rome, the Lagid kingdom of Egypt, by the Romans.

From a political standpoint, the Hellenistic Period is marked by the partition and disintegration of Alexander’s formerempire, as well as an ongoing series of conflicts between the Diadochi and their descendants.

Rome was expanding at the same time, wiping out every other governmental presence in Italy, and then the Carthaginian rule of theMediterranean, which culminated in the three Punic Wars.

This period is defined by the division of Alexander’s previous kingdom, with constant conflicts between the Diadochi and their successors, and the rise of the Hellenistic Period.

The increasing pressure from the Celts’ neighbors, particularly from Germanic tribes and the Romans, however, resulted in a significant reduction in their authority by the end of the era.

In general, certain characteristics of this period contrasted with those of the preceding one, including: Formerly dominant city-state models were supplanted by several types of kingdoms, each of which had more control over its own territory and people.

At the same time, mercenaries were more commonly used by Hellenistic forces in order to keep up with the military and technological advancements, which significantly raised the expense of equipping a municipal army throughout the period under consideration.

Macedonian Silver Tetradrachm depicting Perseus Mark Cartwright is a writer who lives in the United Kingdom (CC BY-NC-SA) According to cultural standards, this time does not represent a transitional phase between the affluent Classic and Imperial eras, as has been suggested in the past.

The development of architecture, a great deal of great euergetism (altruistic donations to the community), a multiplication of feast days and celebrations (as evidenced by the large number of theatres built), the development of art, and the establishment of libraries, the most famous of which was in Alexandria, were all evident during this period.

Did you find this definition to be helpful? Prior to publication, this paper was checked for correctness, dependability, and conformance to academic standards by two independent reviewers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *